Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45206

in Cincinnati, OhioPopulation 10,299

52.22/ 100

Ranked #13,166 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranked #280 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #62 of 156 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Transit access

9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

751 units

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

180 intersections/sq mi

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

20.6%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.75 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

37%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.19 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 45206, one of several in Cincinnati, Ohio ranks in the top 41% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,166th) and the top 24% of Ohio (280th).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: transit lands in the top 1.6% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing registers in the top 2.4% nationally. Floodplain exposure sits at the national minimum, and walkability rests in the top 3.4% nationally. Childcare is in the top 4.5% nationally, and mental-health providers stands in the top 4.7% nationally. Against that, modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the top 3.9% nationally, households without a vehicle lies in the top 4.3% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk resides in the top 4.5% nationally. Homeownership lands in the bottom 4.6% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 45202, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.9%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

4 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.3 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $62,648 predicts 78.2 years — 4.9 years below.

    Ranked #5,517 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.3 ± 1.5 years. The 44 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.3 years — 3.0 years below them.

    Ranked #2,380 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 5.5 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 56.7 — 51 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,505 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 73.3 ± 1.5 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.9%23.7–28.1
High blood pressure among adults36.9%34.3–39.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.3%5.8–6.9
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.7–13.3
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.7–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.0%6.2–7.8
Depression among adults24.9%22.2–27.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.6%13.1–16.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.2%29.5–35.1
Obesity among adults37.6%33.6–41.9
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.6%16.1–21.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.3%7.0–9.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.7%76.7–80.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.6%76.9–82.2
Cholesterol screening among adults85.0%83.3–86.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.4%64.7–72.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.7%55.8–61.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.0%76.0–85.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.0%14.7–19.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.2%12.4–16.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.3%22.4–28.5
Short sleep duration among adults40.6%36.8–44.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.2%18.1–22.5
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%16.1–19.9
Frequent physical distress among adults12.1%10.8–13.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%12.4–15.6
Any disability among adults27.6%24.7–30.7
Hearing disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.8
Independent living disability among adults8.7%7.8–9.8
Mobility disability among adults13.5%12.0–15.2
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.2–5.1
Vision disability among adults5.9%5.4–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.6%19.6–26.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.4%17.0–22.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.6%16.5–21.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.7%13.7–18.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.6%9.4–12.0
Loneliness among adults34.4%30.2–38.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.6%11.1–14.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate20.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–644.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)12.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)54.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)2.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle20.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription87.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate37.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population3.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households59.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+17.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age37.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$62,648$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$271,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$933$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.3 yr ± 0.7578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.75 years of 73.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured