Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45162

in Pleasant Plain, OhioPopulation 2,754

54.72/ 100

Ranked #9,802 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranked #195 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #48 of 156 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFOS in drinking water

93.7%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

70.6%

in the top 17% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Pleasant Plain, Ohio (ZIP 45162) stands in the top 31% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,802nd) and the top 17% of Ohio (195th).

continue reading

The strongest marks in the data are worth naming first: modeled disaster risk lies in the bottom 14.6% nationally, and homeownership is in the top 15% nationally. Modeled colon screening registers in the top 17% nationally. On the other side, PFOS in drinking water lies in the top 7.3% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the top 9.9% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Recreation lies at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. PFAS in drinking water is in the top 18% nationally, and fatal road crashes registers in the top 19% nationally. Physicians lies at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs.

Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. ZIP 45152, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.7%27.3–32.2
High blood pressure among adults35.0%32.2–37.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.5–9.9
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.7–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.0–7.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.6–8.4
Depression among adults25.2%22.6–27.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.1%10.9–13.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.8%33.8–39.7
Obesity among adults35.1%30.7–39.7
Stroke among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.5%9.0–12.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%5.4–7.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.2%77.0–81.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.1%76.6–81.4
Cholesterol screening among adults87.2%85.7–88.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.6%67.3–73.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.0%62.4–67.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.3%70.1–79.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.0%15.8–20.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.6–18.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.3%20.2–26.4
Short sleep duration among adults37.1%32.9–41.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.0%15.0–19.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%15.5–18.8
Frequent physical distress among adults13.4%12.0–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.1%11.6–14.6
Any disability among adults27.3%24.2–30.2
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.9–7.2
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.3–7.9
Mobility disability among adults12.2%10.7–13.8
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.6
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.9%17.2–22.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.7–12.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.5–9.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.6–10.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.2–6.8
Loneliness among adults31.7%27.8–35.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.4–7.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–646.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)11.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)3.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle7.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription93.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate91.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households59.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+19.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age46.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$84,722$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$216,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,411$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.3 yr ± 0.9478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.94 years of 78.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured