Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48044

in Macomb, MichiganPopulation 58,754

58.73/ 100

Ranked #5,801 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #146 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 15%)

Ranked #75 of 215 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.6 mi

in the bottom 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

97.9%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

4.6%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.5%

in the bottom 11.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$117,856

in the top 10.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

9.1%

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.7%

in the bottom 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

7.3%

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 48044, one of several in Macomb, Michigan ranks in the top 18% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,801st) and the top 15% of Michigan (146th).

continue reading

The profile opens on a set of genuinely favorable readings: fatal road crashes stands in the bottom 7.1% nationally, and home broadband subscription settles in the top 7.7% nationally. Lead in tap water lies in the bottom 10.3% nationally, and walkability resides in the top 11.6% nationally. Modeled hearing disability lands in the bottom 11.0% nationally, household income registers in the top 10.4% nationally, and modeled diabetes sits in the bottom 9.4% nationally. On the other side, modeled expected annual loss rests in the top 4.3% nationally, distance to a Superfund site is in the bottom 6.0% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure stands in the top 7.8% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 48042, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.9 ± 1.2 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.4 years — 2.5 years above them.

    Ranked #1,163 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.5%24.0–29.1
High blood pressure among adults32.8%29.8–35.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.1%7.4–8.9
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults5.2%4.7–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Depression among adults26.5%23.5–29.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.1%8.0–10.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.6%32.4–38.8
Obesity among adults35.1%30.7–39.8
Stroke among adults2.7%2.5–2.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.3%5.9–8.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.3%4.5–6.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.4%73.5–79.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%77.8–83.2
Cholesterol screening among adults88.2%86.7–89.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.9%63.9–71.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.2%70.4–75.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.9%73.3–83.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.8%16.1–21.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.1%11.4–15.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.7%18.9–24.8
Short sleep duration among adults36.3%32.4–40.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.1%14.3–18.1
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%15.2–18.8
Frequent physical distress among adults12.3%11.0–13.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.2%11.8–14.6
Any disability among adults27.2%24.3–30.4
Hearing disability among adults5.5%4.9–6.2
Independent living disability among adults7.0%6.3–7.8
Mobility disability among adults10.7%9.5–12.1
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.6–3.1
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.4%19.4–25.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.4%9.7–13.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.9–10.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.3–11.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.6–7.2
Loneliness among adults32.8%28.8–37.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.8–7.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–642.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)6.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)37.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)5.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle1.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription97.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate88.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population11.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households47.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+13.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age40.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$117,856$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$370,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,343$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.9 yr ± 0.5978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.59 years of 80.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured