Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45013

in Hamilton, OhioPopulation 53,998

48.76/ 100

Ranked #17,977 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #502 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #82 of 156 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

90.1%

in the top 16% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, ZIP 45013, one of several in Hamilton, Ohio lands in the bottom 44% nationally (17,977th) and the top 43% of Ohio (502nd).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: distance to an emergency room sits at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Distance to a community health center lands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home lies at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Set against that, distance to a Superfund site stands at the national minimum, and modeled expected annual loss rests in the top 3.9% nationally. PFAS in drinking water registers at the national maximum, and modeled disaster risk resides in the top 7.2% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the top 8.5% nationally, and pfas is in the top 12.6% nationally. PFOA in drinking water sits in the top 15% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. On the overall standing, ZIP 45014, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.7 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $73,633 predicts 78.9 years — 2.2 years below.

    Ranked #2,938 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.0%28.1–34.1
High blood pressure among adults37.8%34.4–41.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.8–10.4
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.8–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.7–9.5
Depression among adults26.7%23.5–30.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.1%11.6–14.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.1%33.6–40.6
Obesity among adults39.9%34.4–45.4
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.2%12.5–18.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.8%6.7–9.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.4%76.9–81.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%77.9–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.2%84.6–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.9%61.4–70.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.4%58.9–65.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.1%70.3–82.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.7%15.0–20.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.5%14.5–18.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.2%25.5–33.0
Short sleep duration among adults36.5%31.5–41.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.0%17.8–22.3
Frequent mental distress among adults18.1%16.2–20.1
Frequent physical distress among adults14.6%13.0–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.3%12.8–15.8
Any disability among adults29.5%26.2–33.0
Hearing disability among adults7.3%6.6–8.2
Independent living disability among adults8.3%7.4–9.2
Mobility disability among adults13.9%12.2–15.6
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.4–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.2–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.4%18.2–24.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.1%11.2–15.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.2–12.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%9.0–12.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.4–8.2
Loneliness among adults35.3%30.4–40.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.5–8.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–647.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)8.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)5.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle4.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription90.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate73.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population2.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households50.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+18.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age37.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$73,633$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$232,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$995$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.7 yr ± 0.4978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.49 years of 76.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured