ZIP code
44404
in Orangeville, OhioPopulation 1,663
42.54/ 100
Ranked #24,786 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 23%)
Ranked #873 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 26%)
Ranked #32 of 50 Youngstown-Warren, OH ZIPs (bottom 36%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Arsenic in groundwater
26.9%
in the top 3.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 6.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST19thUS6thDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
10.5%
in the top 6.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Walkability
2 intersections/sq mi
in the bottom 7.3% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS7thDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
93.4%
in the top 11.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST93rdUS89thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
17%
in the top 11.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS88thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Crowded housing
4.9%
in the top 14.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS86thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.
Full methodology ›Stroke
5.1%
in the top 12.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS87thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
10.1%
in the top 17% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS83rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
41.8%
in the top 17% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS83rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›The read
Orangeville, Ohio (ZIP 44404), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 23% nationally (24,786th) and the bottom 26% of Ohio (873rd).
Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: modeled disaster risk is in the bottom 6.4% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise resides at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Homeownership rests in the top 11.0% nationally. By contrast, modeled arsenic lies in the top 3.9% nationally, and coronary heart disease sits in the top 6.5% nationally. Walkability settles in the bottom 7.3% nationally. Fiber broadband registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled diabetes stands in the top 11.9% nationally, modeled industrial-pollution burden lands in the top 13.6% nationally, and crowded housing is in the top 14.2% nationally.
Defined in plain terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 16150, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Youngstown-Warren, OH metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 68%
13%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 88%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 42%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 53%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 8%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 30%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 28%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 22%
8%
Disability
healthier than 24%
7%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 70%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 69%
13%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 94%
5%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 54%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 48%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 49%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 6%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 31%
16%
Disability
healthier than 13%
7%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 80%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 63%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 67%
11%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 88%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 41%
16%
Mental Health
healthier than 47%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 18%
21%
Disability
healthier than 31%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 29%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
16150
Pennsylvaniashares a border
Score 51.51
Closest healthier
44403
Ohioshares a border
Score 49.59
Similar health profile
47368
Indiana98% similar profile
Score 45.15
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 39.5% | 35.9–42.7 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 43.1% | 39.2–46.8 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 11.6% | 10.4–12.8 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.3% | 10.0–12.7 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 10.5% | 9.3–11.9 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 12.2% | 10.3–14.2 |
| Depression among adults | 26.2% | 22.7–29.5 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 17.0% | 14.7–19.3 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 41.8% | 37.7–45.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 39.3% | 33.5–44.8 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.1% | 4.5–5.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 20.0% | 16.8–23.7 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 8.1% | 6.2–10.3 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 83.9% | 81.4–85.8 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 81.8% | 78.8–84.3 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 86.5% | 84.6–88.2 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 66.8% | 62.6–70.9 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 61.5% | 58.3–64.7 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 73.7% | 66.9–80.1 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.8% | 11.4–16.2 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 18.9% | 15.5–22.2 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 33.1% | 27.9–37.9 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 37.0% | 32.3–41.9 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 23.4% | 19.7–27.2 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 18.1% | 15.9–20.4 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 17.0% | 14.7–19.4 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 15.3% | 13.1–17.6 |
| Any disability among adults | 35.4% | 30.8–39.9 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 10.1% | 8.9–11.4 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 10.3% | 8.8–12.0 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 19.3% | 16.4–22.3 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.1% | 4.4–6.0 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.3% | 5.4–7.3 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 20.4% | 16.8–24.1 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 15.3% | 12.3–18.8 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 14.5% | 11.6–17.8 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.5% | 8.7–12.6 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 8.0% | 6.7–9.4 |
| Loneliness among adults | 32.1% | 27.0–37.1 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 8.2% | 6.9–9.6 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OH median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 20.6% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 10.2% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 18.7% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 7.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 18.1% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 19.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 2.7% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171 |
| Households without a vehicle | 8.8% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177 |
| Broadband subscription | 81.4% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 13.5% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177 |
| Homeownership rate | 93.4% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 78.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 4.9% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180 |
| Single-parent households | 55.4% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 53.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168 |
| Population 65+ | 27.4% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180 |
| Median age | 43.2 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169 |
| Median household income | $55,972 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127 |
| Median home value | $193,700 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117 |
| Median gross rent | $922 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OH median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 77.7 yr ± 1.92 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.92 years of 77.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured