Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

44695

in Bowerston, OhioPopulation 1,273

42.49/ 100

Ranked #24,831 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranked #874 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranked #29 of 40 Canton-Massillon, OH ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

47.1 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.1 pCi/L

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

41%

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US77th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Bowerston, Ohio (ZIP 44695) lands in the bottom 23% nationally (24,831st) and the bottom 26% of Ohio (874th).

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: modeled tree cover sits in the top 13.1% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Crowded housing lies at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Outer-floodplain exposure stands at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Modeled expected annual loss rests in the bottom 20% nationally. On the other side, fatal road crashes registers in the top 4.7% nationally, and modeled radon resides in the top 9.1% nationally. Recreation settles at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Physicians is at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Modeled tooth loss sits in the top 17% nationally.

Put simply, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". On the overall standing, ZIP 44615, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Canton-Massillon, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 45%

13%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.3%31.7–37.0
High blood pressure among adults41.8%38.6–44.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.2–10.8
Current asthma among adults11.0%10.0–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults9.1%8.2–9.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.3%9.1–11.5
Depression among adults25.9%23.2–28.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.0%13.4–16.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.0%38.0–44.2
Obesity among adults40.0%34.5–45.4
Stroke among adults4.3%3.9–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.2%17.7–23.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.5%7.2–10.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.9%78.9–82.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.4%76.8–81.7
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%84.3–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.6%60.9–68.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.3%53.5–59.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.4%67.8–78.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.9%13.8–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.3%17.0–21.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.2%27.4–35.0
Short sleep duration among adults39.7%35.0–44.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.1%19.6–24.7
Frequent mental distress among adults18.4%16.8–20.1
Frequent physical distress among adults16.1%14.4–17.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.2%13.6–16.9
Any disability among adults33.8%30.2–37.3
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.7–9.4
Independent living disability among adults9.0%8.0–10.0
Mobility disability among adults16.4%14.6–18.4
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.8–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.1%19.3–25.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.8%11.8–16.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.8–13.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%9.1–12.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.5–8.4
Loneliness among adults34.7%30.8–38.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.7–8.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–6418.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)9.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)5.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle4.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription85.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate81.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households67.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+25.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age50.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$75,051$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$215,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$564$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.8 yr ± 1.3178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.31 years of 77.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured