Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

44145

in Westlake, OhioPopulation 34,104

64.36/ 100

Ranked #2,265 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 7.1%)

Ranked #28 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 2.4%)

Ranked #8 of 113 Cleveland, OH ZIPs (top 7.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Housing insecurity

6.0%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.3%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

3.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

6.9%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

9.4%

in the bottom 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.4%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

4.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

Westlake, Ohio (ZIP 44145), overall, ranks in the top 7.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,265th) and the top 2.4% of Ohio (28th).

continue reading

This area's strengths are easy to pick out across the measures: modeled housing insecurity lies in the bottom 2.6% nationally, modeled transportation stands in the bottom 2.6% nationally, and physicians rests in the top 2.7% nationally. Modeled food insecurity registers in the bottom 3.3% nationally, lead in tap water resides at the national minimum, and dental providers settles in the top 5.0% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability is in the bottom 3.0% nationally. Distance to an emergency room sits at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled utility shutoff lands in the bottom 6.6% nationally, and transit lies in the top 7.1% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. ZIP 44140, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall. This area also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cleveland, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 97%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 94%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 79.8 ± 1.0 years. The 45 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.5 years — 2.2 years above them.

    Ranked #1,278 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.8%26.4–31.1
High blood pressure among adults34.3%31.7–37.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.9%9.9–11.9
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.2–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.7–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.8%5.1–6.5
Depression among adults23.1%20.7–25.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.1%8.9–11.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.0%37.1–43.0
Obesity among adults27.7%24.6–31.2
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.0%5.8–8.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.9%4.1–5.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.2%77.8–82.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.1%78.7–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults90.6%89.5–91.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.6%69.5–75.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults75.5%73.2–77.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.8%75.3–83.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.8%16.5–21.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.5%8.2–10.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.3%15.1–19.7
Short sleep duration among adults31.5%28.5–34.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.2%11.6–14.9
Frequent mental distress among adults12.8%11.5–14.2
Frequent physical distress among adults10.9%9.7–12.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.4%8.3–10.5
Any disability among adults24.2%21.7–26.9
Hearing disability among adults6.6%5.8–7.3
Independent living disability among adults5.6%4.9–6.3
Mobility disability among adults11.0%9.6–12.4
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.2–2.8
Vision disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults17.4%15.0–20.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.8–8.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.7%3.9–5.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.1–7.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.7–4.9
Loneliness among adults32.8%29.0–36.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.4%3.7–5.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–643.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)4.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)60.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)3.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle5.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription93.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate73.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population12.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households55.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+25.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age46.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$112,200$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$368,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,570$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.8 yr ± 0.5378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.53 years of 79.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured