Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

44136

in Strongsville, OhioPopulation 24,946

61.00/ 100

Ranked #4,130 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 12.9%)

Ranked #64 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 5.5%)

Ranked #17 of 113 Cleveland, OH ZIPs (top 15%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Dental provider access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Park land

22.1%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

81.1%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

3.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.7%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.7%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.3%

in the bottom 11.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.5%

in the bottom 11.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

18.9%

in the top 11.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

29.4%

in the bottom 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US15th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, ZIP 44136, one of several in Strongsville, Ohio ranks in the top 12.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,130th) and the top 5.5% of Ohio (64th).

continue reading

The measures that set this area apart are worth putting up front: dental providers settles in the top 5.7% nationally, and park land resides in the top 6.3% nationally. Modeled mammography registers in the top 6.4% nationally, and transit rests in the top 10.0% nationally. Lead in tap water stands in the bottom 10.2% nationally, modeled cognitive disability lies in the bottom 8.4% nationally, and modeled energy burden lands in the bottom 8.1% nationally. Modeled transportation sits in the bottom 11.1% nationally, modeled housing insecurity is in the bottom 11.4% nationally, and elder services settles in the top 13.2% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Close by, ZIP 44149, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall. On other measures, the area also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cleveland, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 96%

8%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 24%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 81.1 ± 1.2 years. The 45 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.2 years — 2.9 years above them.

    Ranked #917 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.6%26.2–31.0
High blood pressure among adults34.7%32.0–37.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.2–11.1
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.4–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.8–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.5%5.7–7.3
Depression among adults23.9%21.3–26.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.6%9.4–12.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.6%36.8–42.6
Obesity among adults29.4%26.0–32.9
Stroke among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.2%6.9–9.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.8%4.9–6.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.2%76.7–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.1%77.6–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults89.4%88.0–90.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.3%68.0–74.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.3%70.9–75.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.1%76.7–84.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.9%16.6–21.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.6%10.0–13.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.4%17.0–22.1
Short sleep duration among adults32.5%29.5–35.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.0%13.2–16.9
Frequent mental distress among adults14.0%12.5–15.6
Frequent physical distress among adults11.8%10.5–13.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.7%9.5–12.1
Any disability among adults25.8%23.1–28.7
Hearing disability among adults6.6%5.9–7.4
Independent living disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.1
Mobility disability among adults11.8%10.4–13.4
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.3–4.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.0%16.4–21.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.6–10.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.4–7.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.4–8.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.6–6.0
Loneliness among adults34.2%30.3–38.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.7–6.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–644.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)5.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)46.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)2.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle4.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription91.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate72.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population13.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households56.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+24.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age45.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$94,648$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$293,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,294$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.1 yr ± 0.6178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.61 years of 81.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured