Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

44124

in Pepper Pike, OhioPopulation 39,779

61.79/ 100

Ranked #3,644 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 11.4%)

Ranked #54 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 4.6%)

Ranked #15 of 113 Cleveland, OH ZIPs (top 13.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Dental provider access

1.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.79 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.9%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.2%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2.5 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.44 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

80.7%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

Pepper Pike, Ohio (ZIP 44124), overall, ranks in the top 11.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,644th) and the top 4.6% of Ohio (54th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: dental providers lands in the top 1.3% nationally, lead in tap water lies at the national minimum, and physicians stands in the top 5.9% nationally. Recreation rests in the top 6.1% nationally, civic registers in the top 6.4% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability resides in the bottom 5.9% nationally. Fatal road crashes settles in the bottom 8.7% nationally, and outpatient is in the top 9.8% nationally. Modeled mammography sits in the top 7.8% nationally. On the other side, modeled loud transportation noise lands in the top 8.0% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 44022, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall. This area also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cleveland, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 98%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 81.2 ± 0.9 years. A median household income of $82,392 predicts 79.3 years — 1.9 years above.

    Ranked #1,022 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 81.2 ± 0.9 years. The 46 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.7 years — 3.5 years above them.

    Ranked #555 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 11.1; chronic-disease standing 70.4 — 59 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,338 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.1%25.8–30.4
High blood pressure among adults34.9%32.2–37.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.2–10.9
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.5–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.6–6.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.0%5.3–6.7
Depression among adults22.9%20.4–25.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.5%9.3–11.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.7%35.9–41.6
Obesity among adults29.3%26.0–32.8
Stroke among adults3.2%3.0–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.2%7.7–10.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.5%4.8–6.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.6%77.3–81.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.9%78.5–83.1
Cholesterol screening among adults89.9%88.7–91.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.9%68.7–74.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.7%70.3–74.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.7%76.2–84.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.2%16.0–20.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.4%9.1–11.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.0%16.6–21.4
Short sleep duration among adults33.2%30.2–36.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.4%12.8–16.1
Frequent mental distress among adults13.6%12.2–15.1
Frequent physical distress among adults11.1%9.9–12.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.2%9.1–11.4
Any disability among adults25.3%22.7–28.0
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Independent living disability among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Mobility disability among adults11.7%10.3–13.0
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.5–3.0
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.3–4.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.3%16.7–22.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.3%8.0–10.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.9–8.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.8–9.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.7–6.1
Loneliness among adults34.6%30.7–38.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.0–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–645.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)3.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)54.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)4.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle7.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription93.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate64.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population13.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households49.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+25.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age43.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$82,392$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$223,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,157$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.2 yr ± 0.4678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.46 years of 81.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured