Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

44101

in Cleveland, OhioPopulation 666

15.21/ 100

Ranked #32,024 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 0.2%)

Ranked #1,176 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 0.09%)

Ranked #113 of 113 Cleveland, OH ZIPs (bottom 0.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Energy-cost burden

15.7%

in the top 0.01% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

27.2%

in the top 0.01% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

56.6%

in the top 0.01% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

34.9%

in the top 0.03% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

33.8%

in the bottom 0.05% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

11.1%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

15.1%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

45.4%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

44.3%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

62%

in the top 0.01% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People without health insurance
  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health

Barriers to reaching care

  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies
  • Limited home internet for telehealth

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

ZIP 44101, one of several in Cleveland, Ohio, on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 0.2% nationally (32,024th) and the bottom 0.09% of Ohio (1,176th).

continue reading

Where the data speaks clearest about this place, it leads: modeled energy burden stands in the top 0.01% nationally, independent living disability is in the top 0.01% nationally, and tooth loss rests in the top 0.01% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability sits in the top 0.03% nationally, colon screening registers in the bottom 0.05% nationally, and self-care disability lands in the top 0.3% nationally. Modeled vision disability resides in the top 0.4% nationally, and housing insecurity lies at the national maximum. Modeled utility shutoff settles at the national maximum, and food insecurity stands in the top 0.01% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, energy burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 44113, just across the boundary. Across the board, the area also shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cleveland, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.05%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.8%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.4%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.01%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.00%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.2%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 1.0%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.00%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.9%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 98%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.00%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.4%25.8–31.3
High blood pressure among adults35.9%32.8–39.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults3.2%2.8–3.6
Current asthma among adults19.4%17.2–21.7
Coronary heart disease among adults4.5%3.9–5.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults17.2%14.4–20.7
Depression among adults45.9%41.7–49.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.3%11.7–15.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened29.4%26.5–32.3
Obesity among adults53.8%49.6–58.1
Stroke among adults4.1%3.6–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years56.6%50.5–63.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years17.8%12.9–24.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure65.4%61.4–69.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.1%71.5–78.4
Cholesterol screening among adults71.8%66.7–76.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years33.8%30.0–37.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults31.8%29.1–34.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years60.7%53.3–67.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.7%12.4–17.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults43.9%37.7–50.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults48.3%42.2–54.5
Short sleep duration among adults51.0%47.3–54.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults43.1%37.3–49.9
Frequent mental distress among adults36.3%32.8–39.9
Frequent physical distress among adults24.8%21.6–28.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults34.9%30.4–40.3
Any disability among adults50.0%44.7–56.0
Hearing disability among adults4.9%4.2–5.6
Independent living disability among adults27.2%23.3–31.9
Mobility disability among adults24.7%21.0–29.1
Self-care disability among adults11.1%9.3–13.4
Vision disability among adults15.1%12.7–18.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.4%21.6–29.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults62.0%55.1–69.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults75.4%69.3–81.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults45.4%39.8–51.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults33.3%28.7–38.6
Loneliness among adults46.7%41.7–51.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults44.3%39.5–49.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–649.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)21.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)2.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+1.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age36.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured