Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

43605

in Toledo, OhioPopulation 24,441

23.74/ 100

Ranked #31,589 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.5%)

Ranked #1,164 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 1.1%)

Ranked #59 of 61 Toledo, OH ZIPs (bottom 3.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tooth loss

32.7%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

14.8%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.7%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

34%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

6.2%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

53.6%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.0%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

22.2%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

44.9%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 43605, one of several in Toledo, Ohio, overall, ranks in the bottom 1.5% nationally (31,589th) and the bottom 1.1% of Ohio (1,164th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Several serious readings shape the profile and deserve first mention: modeled tooth loss lies in the top 1.9% nationally, independent living disability stands in the top 2.9% nationally, and self-care disability rests in the top 3.6% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health registers in the top 3.4% nationally, energy burden resides in the top 2.3% nationally, and colon screening settles in the bottom 3.8% nationally. Modeled vision disability is in the top 4.9% nationally, and cognitive disability sits in the top 3.6% nationally. Modeled short sleep lands in the top 3.2% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden lies in the top 2.8% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. ZIP 43460, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Toledo, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 79%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.8%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 2%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 74%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.4%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 2%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 67%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 1%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 71.8 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $39,118 predicts 76.4 years — 4.6 years below.

    Ranked #5,393 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 71.8 ± 1.1 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.0 years — 6.2 years below them.

    Ranked #3,568 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.2%29.6–34.8
High blood pressure among adults40.3%37.2–43.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.8%6.2–7.4
Current asthma among adults12.6%11.3–14.0
Coronary heart disease among adults9.3%8.4–10.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.6%12.3–14.9
Depression among adults30.0%26.9–33.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.9%16.0–19.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.3%33.3–39.4
Obesity among adults43.2%38.5–47.9
Stroke among adults5.1%4.7–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years32.7%29.7–35.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.6%14.6–18.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.5%75.0–80.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.2%75.4–81.0
Cholesterol screening among adults79.5%77.5–81.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years53.6%50.8–56.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults45.3%43.1–47.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.3%63.9–72.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%12.4–17.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults27.1%24.3–29.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults41.9%38.0–45.8
Short sleep duration among adults44.9%42.3–47.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults34.0%31.1–37.0
Frequent mental distress among adults23.4%21.2–25.7
Frequent physical distress among adults20.2%18.3–22.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.2%20.1–24.4
Any disability among adults41.8%38.2–45.5
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.4–9.2
Independent living disability among adults14.8%13.4–16.2
Mobility disability among adults21.8%19.7–23.9
Self-care disability among adults7.7%7.1–8.4
Vision disability among adults10.0%9.2–10.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.9%22.6–29.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults33.5%30.1–37.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults34.0%30.9–37.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.1%21.4–27.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults16.9%15.2–18.7
Loneliness among adults40.1%35.5–44.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults19.3%17.2–21.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate38.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–6413.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)20.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)14.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle12.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription88.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate48.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population3.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households34.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+8.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age33.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$39,118$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$49,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$835$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth71.8 yr ± 0.5878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.58 years of 71.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured