Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

67642

in Hill City, KansasPopulation 1,752

46.98/ 100

Ranked #20,189 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranked #489 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Nitrate in drinking water

44.6%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.7 pCi/L

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.7%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.8 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.2%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

57 mi

in the top 9.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

13.4%

in the bottom 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US18th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

The read

Hill City, Kansas (ZIP 67642), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 37% nationally (20,189th) and the bottom 28% of Kansas (489th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures that matter most for this area lead the way: modeled nitrate sits in the top 1.1% nationally, and radon lies in the top 3.6% nationally. Walkability rests in the bottom 6.5% nationally, and modeled hearing disability resides in the top 8.0% nationally. On the better side, grocery is in the top 1.1% nationally, fiber broadband lands in the top 2.8% nationally, and pharmacy stands in the top 3.4% nationally. Distance to an emergency room registers at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the bottom 8.2% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site sits in the top 9.5% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 67656, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.8%31.1–38.5
High blood pressure among adults42.8%38.2–47.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.6%10.4–12.7
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults9.6%8.5–11.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.6%8.0–11.3
Depression among adults19.9%16.9–23.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.2%12.2–16.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.6%36.9–46.2
Obesity among adults36.9%28.9–45.3
Stroke among adults4.7%4.1–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.2%16.0–23.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.2%6.4–10.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.6%80.9–85.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%76.3–82.9
Cholesterol screening among adults87.4%85.5–89.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.7%56.4–67.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.3%57.9–65.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.4%61.2–77.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.4%10.9–16.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.6%12.8–18.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.2%25.1–35.4
Short sleep duration among adults33.2%26.9–40.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.9%17.7–24.4
Frequent mental distress among adults15.2%13.4–17.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.8%12.8–17.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.3%12.3–16.4
Any disability among adults36.3%31.6–41.0
Hearing disability among adults11.2%9.8–12.6
Independent living disability among adults9.2%7.8–10.7
Mobility disability among adults18.7%15.9–21.7
Self-care disability among adults4.5%3.9–5.3
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.7–6.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.4%16.2–22.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.8%9.4–14.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.4%5.8–9.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.6–11.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.5–7.6
Loneliness among adults28.9%24.0–34.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.2–8.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688
Uninsured 18–6411.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686
No HS diploma (25+)7.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689
Unemployment rate (16+)6.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689
Households without a vehicle4.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688
Broadband subscription86.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32219.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688
Homeownership rate72.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692
Single-parent households53.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684
Population 65+25.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692
Median age43.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689
Median household income$49,896$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659
Median home value$98,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627
Median gross rent$735$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$820 ($592–$1,257) n=519
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.7 yr ± 1.0478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.04 years of 77.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured