Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

62901

in Carbondale, IllinoisPopulation 22,946

48.41/ 100

Ranked #18,399 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranked #903 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Homeownership rate

30%

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

29.6%

in the bottom 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

570 units

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

8.3 ppb

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

US95th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

33.9%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

17.7%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.9%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, ZIP 62901, one of several in Carbondale, Illinois stands in the bottom 43% nationally (18,399th) and the bottom 34% of Illinois (903rd).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: modeled high cholesterol stands in the bottom 3.0% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing sits in the top 3.8% nationally. Physicians resides in the top 4.6% nationally. Distance to an emergency room stands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. By contrast, homeownership sits in the bottom 3.2% nationally, modeled expected annual loss resides in the top 4.0% nationally, and lead in tap water stands in the top 4.7% nationally. Poverty sits in the top 4.9% nationally, modeled disaster risk resides in the top 5.5% nationally, and households without a vehicle stands in the top 5.5% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. ZIP 62903, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 2%

8%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 20.7; chronic-disease standing 84.1 — 63 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,741 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.2%17.8–22.8
High blood pressure among adults30.2%26.6–34.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.6%5.1–6.1
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.8–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults5.0%4.5–5.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Depression among adults23.3%19.7–27.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.0%8.7–11.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened29.6%26.0–33.5
Obesity among adults39.9%32.2–48.2
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.1%10.1–14.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.4%8.0–11.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure68.4%65.9–70.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.3%72.4–79.9
Cholesterol screening among adults78.3%75.8–80.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.4%56.5–66.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.3%51.5–59.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.1%64.5–79.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.7%14.6–21.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.3%11.5–15.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.4%20.4–29.0
Short sleep duration among adults39.0%32.3–46.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.5%18.0–23.3
Frequent mental distress among adults20.3%18.0–22.7
Frequent physical distress among adults12.4%10.9–14.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.2%15.3–19.4
Any disability among adults31.6%27.4–36.3
Hearing disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.4
Independent living disability among adults10.5%9.4–11.8
Mobility disability among adults11.7%10.3–13.3
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.6–4.3
Vision disability among adults6.2%5.6–6.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.9%22.2–29.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.1%20.2–26.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.9%21.2–26.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.7%14.6–19.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.9–15.0
Loneliness among adults37.8%32.4–43.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.9–14.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate33.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–646.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)4.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)48.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)9.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle17.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription84.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)42.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate30.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population9.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households40.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+10.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age25.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$35,089$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$146,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$754$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured