Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

35648

in Lexington, AlabamaPopulation 3,128

49.82/ 100

Ranked #16,506 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranked #122 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #4 of 13 Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Elder-services access

0.27 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

11 mi

in the top 12.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

9.2%

in the bottom 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US20th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

The read

Lexington, Alabama (ZIP 35648), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 49% nationally (16,506th) and the top 20% of Alabama (122nd).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: elder services lies in the top 5.3% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests in the top 12.5% nationally. Modeled arsenic resides in the bottom 12.8% nationally, and housing-cost burden is in the bottom 13.1% nationally. Pharmacy lands in the top 17% nationally. Pulling the other way, distance to an emergency room stands in the top 14.0% nationally, modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the top 15% nationally, and home broadband subscription settles in the bottom 17% nationally. Recreation sits at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat lies in the top 18% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 35645, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 39%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.4%28.8–36.0
High blood pressure among adults40.4%36.1–44.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%8.9–10.9
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.8–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%6.9–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%7.7–10.1
Depression among adults24.8%21.1–28.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.0%11.2–14.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.2%37.7–46.9
Obesity among adults35.5%28.1–43.6
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.2%7.5–11.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.0%7.4–10.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.9%75.9–81.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.4%75.6–82.8
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%83.7–87.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.7%63.8–73.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.4%58.7–66.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.3%69.0–82.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%12.1–18.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.7%13.3–18.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.8%22.3–31.6
Short sleep duration among adults39.1%32.6–45.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.5%18.5–24.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.4%15.4–19.6
Frequent physical distress among adults14.9%13.0–16.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.2%14.2–18.5
Any disability among adults36.4%31.7–41.2
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.4–10.6
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.3–10.6
Mobility disability among adults16.6%14.2–19.0
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.4%19.1–26.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.9%11.5–16.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.6%7.9–11.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.4–11.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.5–8.7
Loneliness among adults33.2%28.5–38.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.7–7.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–645.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)9.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)0.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle2.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription80.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)12.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate87.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population0.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households63.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+20.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age37.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$79,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$172,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$661$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.3 yr ± 0.8078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.80 years of 75.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured