Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

35613

in Athens, AlabamaPopulation 25,523

53.67/ 100

Ranked #11,123 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranked #67 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (top 10.9%)

Ranked #15 of 31 Huntsville, AL ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST27th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

2.0%

in the bottom 14.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

5.0%

in the bottom 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US19th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US81st
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

102 days/year

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US78th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$100,845

in the top 19% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US81st
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 35613, one of several in Athens, Alabama, overall, ranks in the top 35% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,123rd) and the top 10.9% of Alabama (67th).

continue reading

This area's most favorable readings come through plainly in the numbers: modeled arsenic stands in the bottom 3.6% nationally, modeled energy burden rests in the bottom 14.1% nationally, and poverty registers in the bottom 19% nationally. On the other side, modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the top 4.0% nationally, modeled expected annual loss settles in the top 6.1% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water is in the top 15.0% nationally. PFOS in drinking water sits in the top 16% nationally, and modeled pfas lands in the top 16% nationally. Modeled disaster risk lies in the top 19% nationally, and humid heat stands in the top 22% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. ZIP 35749, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Huntsville, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.9 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $100,845 predicts 80.1 years — 2.2 years below.

    Ranked #2,938 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.4%26.9–33.7
High blood pressure among adults40.7%36.2–44.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.2–9.9
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.5–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%6.0–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%6.4–8.0
Depression among adults24.2%20.6–27.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.6–13.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.3%36.7–45.5
Obesity among adults38.5%30.4–45.7
Stroke among adults3.4%3.2–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.1%8.8–13.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.0%6.8–9.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.8%73.5–79.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%76.2–82.9
Cholesterol screening among adults87.2%85.4–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.3%63.1–72.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.7%58.6–66.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.4%69.4–83.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.3%12.4–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.8%11.9–15.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.0%19.9–27.9
Short sleep duration among adults37.9%31.2–44.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.2%16.8–21.6
Frequent mental distress among adults16.0%14.1–17.9
Frequent physical distress among adults13.2%11.6–14.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.4%12.8–16.1
Any disability among adults32.7%28.4–36.7
Hearing disability among adults7.9%7.0–8.8
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.3–9.0
Mobility disability among adults14.6%12.8–16.5
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.3–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.5%4.1–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.8%18.5–25.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.1%11.3–15.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.3–9.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.6–11.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.3–8.0
Loneliness among adults33.6%28.6–38.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.8–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–649.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)9.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)36.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)1.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle1.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription90.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate86.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population3.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households54.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+19.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age42.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$100,845$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$329,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$1,264$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.9 yr ± 0.5478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.54 years of 77.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured