Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37878

in Tallassee, TennesseePopulation 761

44.26/ 100

Ranked #23,166 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranked #207 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranked #36 of 72 Knoxville, TN ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tree cover

88.8%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.03%

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

44.5%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US22nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

The read

Tallassee, Tennessee (ZIP 37878), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 28% nationally (23,166th) and the top 34% of Tennessee (207th).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: modeled tree cover sits in the top 1.7% nationally, and transportation noise settles in the bottom 6.5% nationally. Unemployment registers at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise lands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Housing-cost burden is in the bottom 14.2% nationally. Crowded housing resides at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. By contrast, modeled high cholesterol rests in the top 5.5% nationally, modeled high blood pressure lies in the top 10.5% nationally, and lead in tap water sits in the top 14.4% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 37801, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Knoxville, TN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.2%34.0–42.3
High blood pressure among adults45.7%40.8–50.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.7%9.6–11.8
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.4–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.5–9.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.2%9.2–13.2
Depression among adults28.8%24.8–32.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.9%13.4–18.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.5%39.6–48.9
Obesity among adults38.1%30.8–45.2
Stroke among adults4.4%3.8–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.8%9.7–14.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.6%7.4–12.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.6%77.1–83.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.0%77.4–83.9
Cholesterol screening among adults89.1%87.3–90.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.4%58.9–69.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.4%52.7–60.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.8%66.6–81.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.3%10.7–15.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.3%15.3–23.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.0%22.6–33.3
Short sleep duration among adults39.1%32.9–45.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.2%20.0–28.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%15.5–20.3
Frequent physical distress among adults17.3%14.6–19.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.0%14.4–19.7
Any disability among adults39.0%33.2–44.2
Hearing disability among adults9.3%8.0–10.6
Independent living disability among adults9.8%8.2–11.4
Mobility disability among adults19.4%16.1–22.7
Self-care disability among adults4.7%3.9–5.6
Vision disability among adults5.7%4.8–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6416.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)4.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle1.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription94.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate67.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households67.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+23.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age39.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$54,821$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$270,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured