Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37185

in Waverly, TennesseePopulation 9,072

36.85/ 100

Ranked #28,604 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.8%)

Ranked #451 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

99.6%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

71.5%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

12.9 mi

in the top 15.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

4.2%

in the top 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US76th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Waverly, Tennessee (ZIP 37185) lands in the bottom 10.8% nationally (28,604th) and the bottom 27% of Tennessee (451st).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: fiber broadband stands in the top 3.2% nationally, and modeled arsenic lies in the bottom 3.8% nationally. Modeled tree cover lands in the top 8.4% nationally, and pharmacy sits in the top 11.7% nationally. Distance to a nursing home is at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Elder services settles in the top 13.9% nationally. On the other side, fatal road crashes resides in the top 10.2% nationally, modeled cognitive disability registers in the top 11.6% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss rests in the top 12.0% nationally. Unemployment stands in the top 12.7% nationally.

A note on the terms: arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 37061, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 45%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.4 ± 1.6 years. A median household income of $51,314 predicts 77.4 years — 3.1 years below.

    Ranked #4,250 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.6%32.9–40.4
High blood pressure among adults44.4%39.8–48.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%9.0–10.8
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.1–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults9.3%8.3–10.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.9%10.6–13.5
Depression among adults30.3%26.2–34.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.2%14.2–18.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.8%37.1–46.5
Obesity among adults42.4%33.3–51.5
Stroke among adults4.8%4.3–5.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.1%15.7–22.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.0%10.1–14.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%76.2–81.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.8%75.1–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults86.4%84.4–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.2%55.5–66.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.1%51.9–60.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.7%62.8–79.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.4%10.9–16.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.5%18.6–24.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.9%26.2–36.3
Short sleep duration among adults37.3%30.2–44.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.8%23.6–30.4
Frequent mental distress among adults20.5%18.3–23.0
Frequent physical distress among adults18.0%16.0–20.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.5%17.4–22.0
Any disability among adults41.3%36.6–46.3
Hearing disability among adults10.2%9.1–11.4
Independent living disability among adults11.6%10.3–13.1
Mobility disability among adults20.7%18.3–23.5
Self-care disability among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
Vision disability among adults6.8%6.1–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6417.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)11.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)8.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle4.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription81.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate75.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population3.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households63.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+22.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age45.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$51,314$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$181,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$900$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.3 yr ± 0.8178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.81 years of 74.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured