Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37078

in Hurricane Mills, TennesseePopulation 974

41.13/ 100

Ranked #25,929 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #292 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Housing-cost burden

48.1%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.9%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST77th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.2%

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

44.5%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

68.4%

in the top 10.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST81st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

10.4%

in the bottom 10.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.1%

in the top 10.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

15.2 mi

in the top 12.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Hurricane Mills, Tennessee (ZIP 37078) ranks in the bottom 19% nationally (25,929th) and the top 47% of Tennessee (292nd).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: recreation registers in the top 4.1% nationally, and fiber broadband sits in the top 5.0% nationally. Modeled arsenic rests in the bottom 5.2% nationally. Unemployment is at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled tree cover stands in the top 10.0% nationally, and pfas settles in the bottom 10.1% nationally. Against that, housing-cost burden lies in the top 3.9% nationally, walkability resides in the bottom 7.3% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol lands in the top 5.5% nationally. Slow internet speeds registers in the top 10.4% nationally.

In plainer terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 37101, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults39.2%35.2–43.5
High blood pressure among adults45.6%40.8–50.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.3%10.1–12.5
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.8–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults9.1%7.9–10.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.3%9.3–13.6
Depression among adults29.2%25.1–33.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.2%13.9–18.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.5%39.5–49.7
Obesity among adults40.4%31.7–49.7
Stroke among adults4.6%4.0–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.0%16.1–24.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.1%7.6–13.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.3%78.3–84.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%77.2–83.9
Cholesterol screening among adults89.5%87.7–91.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.1%59.6–70.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.6%54.4–62.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.0%63.0–79.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.6%10.2–15.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.1%15.5–23.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.9%23.6–35.1
Short sleep duration among adults35.8%28.6–43.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.5%20.4–29.1
Frequent mental distress among adults18.5%16.2–21.1
Frequent physical distress among adults17.4%14.9–20.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.1%14.5–19.9
Any disability among adults39.1%33.6–45.0
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.5–11.2
Independent living disability among adults10.0%8.5–11.8
Mobility disability among adults20.1%16.8–23.7
Self-care disability among adults4.7%3.9–5.6
Vision disability among adults5.8%4.9–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6445.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)13.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle3.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription78.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)48.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate55.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households56.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+21.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age38.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$54,219$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$257,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$1,692$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.0 yr ± 1.3078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.30 years of 75.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured