Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

36277

in Weaver, AlabamaPopulation 4,918

50.43/ 100

Ranked #15,650 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranked #110 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #1 of 11 Anniston-Oxford, AL ZIPs (top 9.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

58 µg/L

in the top 11.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.33%

in the bottom 12.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

The read

Weaver, Alabama (ZIP 36277), in overall standing, comes out in the top 49% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,650th) and the top 18% of Alabama (110th).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: fatal road crashes rests at the national minimum. Modeled loud transportation noise settles at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise lands in the bottom 12.5% nationally. Crowded housing rests at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Against that, lithium in drinking water settles in the top 11.0% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water lands in the top 13.9% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden rests in the top 14.6% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water settles in the top 14.7% nationally. Slow internet speeds lands in the top 16% nationally, and modeled short sleep rests in the top 16% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 35907, about 11 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Anniston-Oxford, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

in the top 0.00%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.5%27.2–33.9
High blood pressure among adults41.7%37.5–45.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.8–9.5
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.1–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.5–8.6
Depression among adults24.7%21.0–28.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.8%11.1–14.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.2%35.9–44.6
Obesity among adults35.6%29.0–42.6
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.3%10.8–16.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.9%7.4–10.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.8%73.9–79.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.1%75.5–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults86.3%84.4–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.9%63.9–73.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.9%55.8–63.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.4%68.9–82.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.4%12.6–18.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.0%12.0–16.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.5%23.3–32.2
Short sleep duration among adults40.3%34.1–46.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.2%18.6–24.3
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%15.2–19.5
Frequent physical distress among adults13.9%12.2–15.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.5%13.7–17.7
Any disability among adults35.0%30.7–39.6
Hearing disability among adults8.1%7.1–9.1
Independent living disability among adults8.9%7.9–10.1
Mobility disability among adults15.5%13.5–17.7
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.5%20.0–27.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.2%12.8–17.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.4–11.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.4–12.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.0%7.0–9.1
Loneliness among adults35.5%30.6–40.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.2–8.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–648.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)10.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)2.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle4.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription94.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate79.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population2.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households49.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+20.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age38.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$62,610$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$159,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$898$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.4 yr ± 0.9278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.92 years of 74.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured