Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

36052

in Mathews, AlabamaPopulation 874

51.10/ 100

Ranked #14,679 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranked #98 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #11 of 41 Montgomery, AL ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

0.75%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$147,656

in the top 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

11.3%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.9 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

141.3 days/year

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

2.4%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

97.6%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

14.3 mi

in the top 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

46.5%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST58th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

Mathews, Alabama (ZIP 36052) ranks in the top 46% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,679th) and the top 16% of Alabama (98th).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: modeled arsenic resides in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and household income stands in the top 4.1% nationally. Recreation sits in the top 5.5% nationally, and poverty resides in the bottom 7.9% nationally. Home broadband subscription stands in the top 8.4% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits in the top 8.6% nationally. By contrast, crowded housing resides in the top 3.8% nationally, walkability stands in the bottom 6.7% nationally, and modeled humid heat sits in the top 7.0% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure resides in the top 8.7% nationally.

For context, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 36013, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Montgomery, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.4%30.9–38.1
High blood pressure among adults46.5%42.4–50.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.7–10.7
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.6–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.3–9.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.8%7.5–10.0
Depression among adults22.0%18.8–25.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.1%14.1–18.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.4%39.3–47.6
Obesity among adults41.6%35.5–47.9
Stroke among adults4.6%4.1–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.4%12.9–18.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.7%6.2–9.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.6%79.0–84.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.0%80.1–85.8
Cholesterol screening among adults89.2%87.6–90.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.8%67.8–75.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.9%59.6–66.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.1%73.0–84.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.1%11.7–16.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.1%11.8–16.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.6%22.6–31.0
Short sleep duration among adults36.8%32.2–41.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.0%19.1–25.1
Frequent mental distress among adults14.8%13.0–16.8
Frequent physical distress among adults14.6%12.7–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.9%12.1–15.8
Any disability among adults35.2%31.0–39.6
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.6–9.7
Independent living disability among adults9.2%8.0–10.4
Mobility disability among adults18.2%15.9–20.8
Self-care disability among adults5.1%4.5–5.7
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.4%19.1–25.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.2%13.8–18.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.9%10.8–15.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.9–13.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.2–9.5
Loneliness among adults31.7%27.3–35.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.2–9.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–648.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)6.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)55.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)2.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle1.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription97.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate89.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)11.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population2.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households82.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+28.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age52.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$147,656$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$617,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.8 yr ± 2.0578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.05 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured