ZIP code
13117
in Montezuma, New YorkPopulation 132
48.63/ 100
Ranked #18,157 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 43%)
Ranked #1,523 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 12.0%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 2.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST5thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Floodplain exposure
50.4%
in the top 3.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.
Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
46.8%
in the top 4.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS96thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 4.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST5thUS5thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Fiber broadband
99%
in the top 4.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST96thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.
Full methodology ›Loud transportation noise
1.9%
in the top 8.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST91stUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
10.1%
in the top 9.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
43%
in the top 10.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS89thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Stroke
5.0%
in the top 14.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS86thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
10.2%
in the top 16% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS84thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›The read
By the composite health measure, Montezuma, New York (ZIP 13117) ranks in the bottom 43% nationally (18,157th) and the bottom 12.0% of New York (1,523rd).
The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: modeled disaster risk settles in the bottom 2.5% nationally, and expected annual loss resides in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Fiber broadband registers in the top 4.6% nationally. Unemployment rests at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. On the other side, floodplain exposure lies in the top 3.9% nationally, housing-cost burden lands in the top 4.4% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise sits in the top 8.1% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease is in the top 9.0% nationally, and high cholesterol settles in the top 10.6% nationally.
To spell things out, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Close by, ZIP 13034, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 88%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 82%
8%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 49%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 51%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 52%
11%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 17%
21%
Disability
healthier than 32%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 13%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 33%
5%
Nothing measured is lifting this score.
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 44%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 43%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 56%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 46%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 2%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 40%
11%
Disability
healthier than 9%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 2%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 28%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
13034
New Yorkshares a border
Score 57.22
Closest healthier
13148
New Yorkshares a border
Score 52.43
Similar health profile
11770
New York97% similar profile
Score 52.00
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 35.7% | 31.8–39.8 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 42.0% | 37.5–46.7 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 12.9% | 11.6–14.4 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.2% | 9.9–12.7 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 10.1% | 8.5–11.9 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 9.9% | 7.8–12.2 |
| Depression among adults | 19.6% | 16.5–22.9 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 13.3% | 11.3–15.7 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 43.0% | 38.5–47.8 |
| Obesity among adults | 34.1% | 27.2–41.7 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.0% | 4.1–6.0 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 15.7% | 12.7–19.1 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 6.0% | 4.2–8.4 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 82.0% | 79.0–84.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 84.0% | 81.1–86.7 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 91.1% | 89.5–92.7 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 63.6% | 59.0–68.1 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 61.9% | 58.4–65.6 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 79.8% | 73.3–85.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.8% | 11.4–16.5 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 14.6% | 11.2–18.0 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 30.6% | 24.3–36.6 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 36.7% | 31.0–43.0 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 21.5% | 17.1–26.4 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 15.3% | 13.1–17.4 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 16.4% | 13.6–19.1 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 13.2% | 10.8–15.7 |
| Any disability among adults | 36.1% | 30.3–41.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 10.2% | 8.6–11.8 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 9.5% | 7.7–11.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 19.1% | 15.3–23.1 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.7% | 3.7–5.7 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.8% | 4.6–7.1 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 24.0% | 19.8–28.0 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.8% | 9.5–16.3 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 11.8% | 8.7–15.1 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.3% | 8.0–12.6 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 7.1% | 5.7–8.5 |
| Loneliness among adults | 33.1% | 27.7–38.4 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 6.4% | 5.2–7.6 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NY median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 7.6% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 1.1% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 5.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 20.6% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 7.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 8.4% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730 |
| Households without a vehicle | 2.1% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 5.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730 |
| Broadband subscription | 87.2% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 91.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 46.8% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 27.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730 |
| Homeownership rate | 68.1% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 80.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 4.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746 |
| Single-parent households | 41.9% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 54.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716 |
| Population 65+ | 9.8% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746 |
| Median age | 51.8 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733 |
| Median household income | $63,250 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626 |
| Median home value | $165,000 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629 |
| Median gross rent | $583 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NY median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 79.8 yr ± 1.46 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.46 years of 79.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured