Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

35621

in Eva, AlabamaPopulation 3,471

45.48/ 100

Ranked #21,890 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #227 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranked #7 of 15 Decatur, AL ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.34 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2.9 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

43.2%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST58th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

11.6 mi

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.34 per 1,000 residents

in the top 20% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US80th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

99.9 days/year

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US77th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

3.3%

in the bottom 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US27th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Eva, Alabama (ZIP 35621) sits in the bottom 32% nationally (21,890th) and the top 37% of Alabama (227th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: grocery settles in the top 3.0% nationally, fatal road crashes stands in the bottom 10.2% nationally, and pharmacy is in the top 11.0% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise rests at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Housing-cost burden sits in the bottom 14.8% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers in the top 17% nationally. On the other hand, modeled industrial-pollution burden lands in the top 9.6% nationally, and high blood pressure resides in the top 11.9% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol lies in the top 9.8% nationally, and distance to a community health center settles in the top 17% nationally.

In plain language, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 35058, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Decatur, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 99%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.7%30.5–37.5
High blood pressure among adults45.2%41.4–49.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.8–10.6
Current asthma among adults10.1%9.0–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.5–9.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.8%8.5–11.1
Depression among adults26.0%22.6–30.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.7%12.9–16.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.2%39.0–47.8
Obesity among adults38.4%32.0–46.0
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.6%14.5–21.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.3%7.6–11.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.3%76.5–81.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.2%75.9–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults85.6%83.6–87.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.9%58.9–68.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.6%53.8–61.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.2%64.4–79.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.7%12.3–17.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.0%15.3–20.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.5%25.3–34.7
Short sleep duration among adults37.0%31.1–43.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.9%21.0–27.4
Frequent mental distress among adults17.4%15.5–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.7%14.0–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.8%14.8–19.2
Any disability among adults38.6%34.2–43.6
Hearing disability among adults10.0%8.9–11.3
Independent living disability among adults10.3%9.1–11.6
Mobility disability among adults18.2%16.0–20.8
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.3
Vision disability among adults5.9%5.3–6.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.6%19.1–26.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.3%13.6–19.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.1%9.9–14.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.4–13.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.3–9.7
Loneliness among adults33.6%28.6–38.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.8–9.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6411.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)6.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)1.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle4.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription86.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate89.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population1.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households44.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+13.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age40.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$78,633$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$214,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$620$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.1 yr ± 0.7378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.73 years of 76.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured