Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

34286

in North Port, FloridaPopulation 22,534

53.79/ 100

Ranked #10,968 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranked #440 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranked #33 of 42 North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

215.7 days/year

in the top 0.09% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

35.2%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST56th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

4.3%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

17.9%

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US80th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

ZIP 34286, one of several in North Port, Florida, by its overall standing, sits in the top 34% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,968th) and the top 45% of Florida (440th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: modeled industrial-pollution burden lands in the bottom 2.6% nationally, home broadband subscription is in the top 17% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site resides in the top 17% nationally. Modeled energy burden rests in the bottom 17% nationally. By contrast, modeled humid heat lies in the top 0.09% nationally, and floodplain exposure sits in the top 7.8% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure settles in the top 8.3% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water registers in the top 10.1% nationally. PFOS in drinking water stands in the top 10.4% nationally, and lead in tap water lands in the top 19% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 34288, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.3%24.6–30.1
High blood pressure among adults34.8%31.5–38.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.7–10.4
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.8–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.0–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.3%6.5–8.2
Depression among adults20.5%17.7–23.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.1%9.7–12.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.8%35.2–42.4
Obesity among adults32.0%26.9–37.4
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.6%8.7–12.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.5%10.0–13.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.0%75.1–80.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.3%74.9–81.2
Cholesterol screening among adults87.3%85.7–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.7%62.3–70.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.3%60.1–66.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.2%67.4–80.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.9%15.0–21.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.4%11.7–15.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.8%19.5–26.3
Short sleep duration among adults35.4%30.8–40.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.2%16.1–20.6
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%15.0–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%12.5–15.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.1%11.7–14.7
Any disability among adults28.5%25.1–32.1
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.8
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.5–8.1
Mobility disability among adults13.4%11.7–15.1
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.2–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6414.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)5.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)5.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle1.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription95.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate79.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population12.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households59.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+20.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age46.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$80,553$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$361,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$2,140$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.6 yr ± 0.4478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.44 years of 78.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured