Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

34695

in Safety Harbor, FloridaPopulation 18,098

58.94/ 100

Ranked #5,638 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #222 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #36 of 133 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

178.7 days/year

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST39th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

3.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2.2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

72.6%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.8%

in the bottom 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Safety Harbor, Florida (ZIP 34695), in overall standing, comes out in the top 18% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,638th) and the top 23% of Florida (222nd).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: physicians settles in the top 3.3% nationally, and fatal road crashes lands in the bottom 7.6% nationally. Modeled extreme heat rests at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled colon screening settles in the top 8.5% nationally, and energy burden lands in the bottom 9.8% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability rests in the bottom 10.8% nationally. Distance to a nursing home settles at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Walkability lands in the top 14.7% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled humid heat rests in the top 1.8% nationally, and high cholesterol settles in the top 11.1% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 34685, about 0.8 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 27%

14%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.1%27.8–34.4
High blood pressure among adults36.3%32.4–40.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.4%11.2–13.6
Current asthma among adults9.3%8.2–10.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.8–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.3%6.3–8.2
Depression among adults19.0%16.1–22.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.1%10.4–13.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.9%38.6–47.0
Obesity among adults29.6%24.3–35.2
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.6%7.9–11.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.4%7.1–9.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.6%77.4–83.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.7%77.5–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults90.8%89.5–92.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.6%68.5–76.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.7%61.5–67.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.6%67.7–80.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%12.9–18.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.4%8.7–12.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.5%17.1–24.0
Short sleep duration among adults33.5%28.8–38.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.0%13.8–18.3
Frequent mental distress among adults14.1%12.3–15.9
Frequent physical distress among adults13.2%11.5–15.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.1%9.7–12.5
Any disability among adults28.5%24.8–32.2
Hearing disability among adults8.0%7.0–8.9
Independent living disability among adults6.6%5.8–7.4
Mobility disability among adults14.0%12.0–16.0
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.6
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–649.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)4.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)46.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)3.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle5.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription93.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate86.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population10.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households58.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+26.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age51.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$95,238$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$439,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,707$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.9 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 79.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured