Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32223

in Jacksonville, FloridaPopulation 26,160

58.92/ 100

Ranked #5,660 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #223 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #14 of 60 Jacksonville, FL ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

157.4 days/year

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

1.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST76th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

73.1%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.7%

in the bottom 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST32nd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

80.1%

in the top 23% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US77th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 32223, one of several in Jacksonville, Florida lands in the top 18% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,660th) and the top 23% of Florida (223rd).

continue reading

A number of measures place this area on solid footing: dental providers lands in the top 4.6% nationally, and physicians sits in the top 8.6% nationally. Modeled colon screening is in the top 7.0% nationally, and energy burden settles in the bottom 7.7% nationally. Home broadband subscription resides in the top 11.8% nationally, and lithium in drinking water registers in the bottom 11.9% nationally. Distance to a nursing home rests at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled radon stands in the bottom 10.0% nationally. By contrast, modeled humid heat lies in the top 3.0% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site lands in the bottom 11.3% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 32003, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Jacksonville, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.9 ± 2.5 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.8 years — 4.1 years above them.

    Ranked #337 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.4%25.5–31.4
High blood pressure among adults35.0%31.6–38.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.6%9.7–11.6
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.6–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.0–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%5.9–7.8
Depression among adults20.0%17.3–22.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.5%10.0–13.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.8%34.2–41.5
Obesity among adults30.2%25.6–35.0
Stroke among adults3.3%3.0–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.4%6.9–10.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.1%8.7–11.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.2%75.4–80.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.9%75.0–80.6
Cholesterol screening among adults88.6%87.2–89.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.1%69.1–76.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.4%60.3–66.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.1%71.8–83.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.8%13.3–18.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.6%9.8–13.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.4%19.1–25.8
Short sleep duration among adults37.6%33.0–42.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.5%14.3–18.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.0%14.2–17.8
Frequent physical distress among adults13.3%11.7–14.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.3%10.8–13.7
Any disability among adults28.2%24.8–31.7
Hearing disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.8
Independent living disability among adults6.9%6.1–7.7
Mobility disability among adults12.6%10.8–14.4
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.8–3.5
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.8–4.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–649.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)4.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)45.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)2.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle2.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription96.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate79.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population11.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households56.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+25.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age47.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$95,347$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$409,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,587$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.9 yr ± 1.2978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.29 years of 80.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured