Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

34473

in Ocala, FloridaPopulation 26,813

50.87/ 100

Ranked #15,042 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranked #547 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #6 of 26 Ocala, FL ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

185.1 days/year

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST54th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

19.9%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.70%

in the bottom 10.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US11th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.26%

in the bottom 11.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 34473, one of several in Ocala, Florida lands in the top 47% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,042nd) and the bottom 44% of Florida (547th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: floodplain exposure resides in the bottom 10.7% nationally. Distance to a community health center registers at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise rests in the bottom 11.6% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure stands at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. On the other side, modeled humid heat lies in the top 1.4% nationally, modeled uninsured lands in the top 4.6% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water sits in the top 14.7% nationally. PFOS in drinking water is in the top 15% nationally, modeled short sleep settles in the top 14.9% nationally, and crowded housing resides in the top 18% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 34476, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Ocala, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.1 ± 1.1 years. The 42 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 75.9 years — 2.2 years above them.

    Ranked #1,321 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.6%25.8–31.5
High blood pressure among adults39.1%35.6–42.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.0–9.7
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.7–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.5–9.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.1%7.2–9.0
Depression among adults17.7%15.2–20.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.5%13.8–17.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.5%35.9–43.2
Obesity among adults38.2%32.8–44.1
Stroke among adults4.5%4.1–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.7%10.5–15.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years19.9%17.5–22.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.3%77.8–82.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.2%77.2–83.0
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%85.4–88.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.0%64.6–73.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.7%51.1–58.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.3%67.5–80.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.6%11.3–16.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.9%12.1–15.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.9%24.3–31.8
Short sleep duration among adults40.5%35.4–45.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.0%21.4–26.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%15.0–18.6
Frequent physical distress among adults16.1%14.4–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.0%13.4–16.7
Any disability among adults34.9%31.2–38.8
Hearing disability among adults8.1%7.3–9.0
Independent living disability among adults9.1%8.2–10.1
Mobility disability among adults18.2%16.2–20.4
Self-care disability among adults5.0%4.5–5.4
Vision disability among adults7.3%6.7–8.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6418.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)12.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)3.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle3.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription91.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate78.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population17.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households52.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+18.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age39.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$72,366$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$265,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,649$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.1 yr ± 0.5678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.56 years of 78.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured