Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

34134

in Bonita Springs, FloridaPopulation 16,475

64.26/ 100

Ranked #2,315 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 7.3%)

Ranked #68 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 7.0%)

Ranked #2 of 35 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL ZIPs (top 5.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

213.4 days/year

in the top 0.10% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

80%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

49.3%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

9.4%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

76.4%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

25.9%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

8.2%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

24.4%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.2%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

In its overall standing, ZIP 34134, one of several in Bonita Springs, Florida lands in the top 7.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,315th) and the top 7.0% of Florida (68th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: modeled colon screening registers in the top 0.3% nationally, binge drinking resides in the bottom 0.7% nationally, and short sleep settles in the bottom 0.7% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability is in the bottom 0.9% nationally, modeled obesity sits in the bottom 4.7% nationally, and recreation lands in the top 3.4% nationally. On the other side, modeled humid heat lies in the top 0.10% nationally, and high cholesterol stands in the top 0.5% nationally. Floodplain exposure rests in the top 1.3% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease registers in the top 3.6% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". On the overall standing, ZIP 34108, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 97%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.2%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.2%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.2%

8%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.6%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 98%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.4%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.4%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.00%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 96.0 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 18.9 — 77 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #649 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults40.4%37.1–43.6
High blood pressure among adults47.3%43.8–50.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults19.7%18.3–21.2
Current asthma among adults8.3%7.5–9.3
Coronary heart disease among adults11.2%10.1–12.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.1%7.1–9.2
Depression among adults14.3%12.4–16.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.8%13.1–16.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened49.3%45.7–52.8
Obesity among adults24.4%20.7–28.4
Stroke among adults4.9%4.4–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.5%6.3–9.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.1%6.1–8.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure87.6%85.5–89.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults87.8%86.0–89.4
Cholesterol screening among adults95.2%94.6–95.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years80.0%76.8–82.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.5%71.0–75.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.8%75.7–85.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults9.4%8.0–11.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.2%6.2–8.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.1%18.1–24.2
Short sleep duration among adults25.9%22.4–29.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.9%13.1–17.0
Frequent mental distress among adults9.8%8.7–10.9
Frequent physical distress among adults13.2%11.7–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults8.2%7.3–9.2
Any disability among adults30.7%27.5–34.2
Hearing disability among adults11.7%10.5–12.9
Independent living disability among adults6.2%5.5–7.0
Mobility disability among adults16.0%14.0–18.1
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.6
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.8–4.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6417.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)1.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)53.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)2.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle3.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription90.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate82.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population10.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households91.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+66.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age70.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$130,719$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$705,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,799$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured