Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32828

in Orlando, FloridaPopulation 69,202

63.09/ 100

Ranked #2,913 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.1%)

Ranked #96 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 9.9%)

Ranked #13 of 92 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL ZIPs (top 14.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

195.1 days/year

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

1,086 units

in the top 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.4%

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.1%

in the bottom 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

26.4%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.2%

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

96.2%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

8.9%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US91st
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 32828, one of several in Orlando, Florida, in overall standing, comes out in the top 9.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,913th) and the top 9.9% of Florida (96th).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: subsidized affordable housing is in the top 1.2% nationally, modeled hearing disability lies in the bottom 3.2% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease registers in the bottom 3.7% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure is in the bottom 4.0% nationally, stroke lies in the bottom 3.5% nationally, and mobility disability registers in the bottom 5.3% nationally. On the other hand, modeled humid heat is in the top 0.7% nationally, and expected annual loss lies in the top 5.9% nationally. PFOS in drinking water registers in the top 6.1% nationally, and modeled disaster risk is in the top 8.7% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, subsidized affordable housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 32832, about 3.0 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 82%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 97%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 95%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 81.9 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $101,767 predicts 80.1 years — 1.8 years above.

    Ranked #1,095 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 81.9 ± 1.4 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.1 years — 2.8 years above them.

    Ranked #964 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults17.2%15.1–19.4
High blood pressure among adults26.4%23.4–29.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.8%5.3–6.3
Current asthma among adults8.7%7.7–9.7
Coronary heart disease among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.8%3.5–4.3
Depression among adults16.4%14.0–18.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.0%7.9–10.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.3%29.9–36.7
Obesity among adults29.8%25.2–34.6
Stroke among adults2.2%2.0–2.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.6%6.2–9.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.3%11.7–15.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.3%68.0–74.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.2%71.8–78.4
Cholesterol screening among adults86.3%84.6–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.9%58.6–67.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.4%59.3–65.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.1%70.6–82.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.7%14.0–19.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.0%7.8–10.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.6%16.9–22.5
Short sleep duration among adults39.5%35.1–44.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.7%13.1–16.5
Frequent mental distress among adults15.2%13.6–16.9
Frequent physical distress among adults10.8%9.6–12.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.2%11.0–13.5
Any disability among adults23.3%20.5–26.2
Hearing disability among adults4.4%3.9–4.9
Independent living disability among adults5.9%5.3–6.5
Mobility disability among adults8.9%7.8–10.0
Self-care disability among adults2.6%2.4–2.8
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.9–4.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–649.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)4.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)53.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)5.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle1.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription96.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate63.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population19.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households43.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+10.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age36.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$101,767$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$432,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,966$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.9 yr ± 0.7378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.73 years of 81.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured