Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32825

in Orlando, FloridaPopulation 63,698

56.17/ 100

Ranked #8,092 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranked #320 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #40 of 92 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

1,526 units

in the top 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

186 days/year

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST58th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

19.4%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

89%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.7 pCi/L

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 32825, one of several in Orlando, Florida ranks in the top 25% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,092nd) and the top 33% of Florida (320th).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: subsidized affordable housing resides in the top 0.6% nationally, and modeled radon lands in the bottom 3.3% nationally. On the other hand, modeled humid heat registers in the top 1.3% nationally, and uninsured sits in the top 5.0% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss rests in the top 7.4% nationally, PFOS in drinking water is in the top 9.3% nationally, and modeled disaster risk stands in the top 11.4% nationally. Floodplain exposure settles in the top 12.8% nationally, modeled loud transportation noise lies in the top 12.9% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site resides in the bottom 13.2% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, subsidized affordable housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 32828, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.6 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $81,651 predicts 79.3 years — 1.4 years above.

    Ranked #1,329 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.8%17.6–22.2
High blood pressure among adults30.8%27.6–33.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.0%5.4–6.5
Current asthma among adults8.8%7.8–9.8
Coronary heart disease among adults5.5%5.0–6.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
Depression among adults16.5%14.1–19.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.7–13.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.8%32.4–39.3
Obesity among adults33.7%28.8–38.7
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.0%9.0–13.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years19.4%17.4–21.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.5%70.5–76.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.2%71.8–78.3
Cholesterol screening among adults84.7%82.8–86.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.3%56.8–65.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.2%51.9–58.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.8%68.0–81.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.9%12.5–17.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.6%10.1–13.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.4%23.1–29.9
Short sleep duration among adults41.0%36.5–45.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.6%18.3–22.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.7–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.5%12.0–15.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.7%13.2–16.3
Any disability among adults29.5%26.1–32.9
Hearing disability among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Independent living disability among adults7.8%7.1–8.7
Mobility disability among adults12.7%11.2–14.3
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.5–4.2
Vision disability among adults6.4%5.9–7.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6413.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)7.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)37.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)5.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle3.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription94.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)34.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate64.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population21.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households48.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+12.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age35.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$81,651$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$355,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,859$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.6 yr ± 0.6578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.65 years of 80.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured