ZIP code
32792
in Winter Park, FloridaPopulation 52,976
57.02/ 100
Ranked #7,254 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 23%)
Ranked #288 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 30%)
Ranked #36 of 92 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL ZIPs (top 39%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Humid extreme heat
180.5 days/year
in the top 1.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST42ndUS98thDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.
Full methodology ›Distance to a Superfund site
In this ZIP
at the national minimum
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›Physician access
2.7 per 1,000 residents
in the top 4.3% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST86thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
44.5%
in the top 5.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST85thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Outpatient-care access
0.56 per 1,000 residents
in the top 6.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST83rdUS94thDefinition & source ›
The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
48%
in the bottom 8.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST11thUS8thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Subsidized affordable housing
275 units
in the top 9.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST80thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the top 9.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS91stDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Radon
0.7 pCi/L
in the bottom 3.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST9thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.
Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
30.3%
in the bottom 12.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST9thUS12thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›The read
On the composite measure, ZIP 32792, one of several in Winter Park, Florida stands in the top 23% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,254th) and the top 30% of Florida (288th).
A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: physicians lies in the top 4.3% nationally, and outpatient is in the top 6.2% nationally. Subsidized affordable housing registers in the top 9.0% nationally, and recreation lies in the top 10.7% nationally. Modeled radon is in the bottom 3.5% nationally. On the other side, modeled humid heat registers in the top 1.7% nationally, distance to a Superfund site lies at the national minimum, and housing-cost burden is in the top 5.8% nationally. Homeownership registers in the bottom 8.0% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss lies in the top 9.1% nationally.
Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. ZIP 32707, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 86%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 73%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 64%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 80%
8%
Disability
healthier than 68%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 84%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 59%
14%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 21%
13%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 16%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 88%
21%
Disability
healthier than 73%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 70%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 74%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 55%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 59%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 50%
8%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 33%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 32%
13%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 71%
21%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 82%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 78%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 47%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 55%
11%
Disability
healthier than 54%
7%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 31%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 37%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 34%
8%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
32707
Floridashares a border
Score 57.60
Closest healthier
32708
Floridashares a border
Score 62.78
Similar health profile
79912
Texas99% similar profile
Score 58.58
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 21.1% | 19.3–22.8 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 30.3% | 27.9–32.6 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 7.3% | 6.8–7.9 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.3% | 8.4–10.2 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 5.8% | 5.3–6.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 5.9% | 5.4–6.4 |
| Depression among adults | 17.7% | 15.8–19.8 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 10.4% | 9.5–11.5 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 34.5% | 31.9–37.0 |
| Obesity among adults | 30.7% | 27.0–34.5 |
| Stroke among adults | 2.9% | 2.8–3.1 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 11.3% | 9.9–13.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 15.5% | 14.0–17.0 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 73.5% | 71.5–75.4 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 75.6% | 73.0–78.1 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 83.8% | 82.4–85.2 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 65.2% | 62.1–68.3 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 59.0% | 56.5–61.5 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 75.5% | 70.6–79.9 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 16.2% | 14.2–18.3 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 11.6% | 10.4–12.8 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 22.9% | 20.5–25.4 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 37.7% | 34.3–41.3 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 18.3% | 16.7–19.9 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 16.9% | 15.5–18.3 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 12.7% | 11.7–13.8 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 14.6% | 13.4–15.9 |
| Any disability among adults | 29.1% | 26.6–31.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 6.2% | 5.7–6.7 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 7.8% | 7.2–8.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 11.8% | 10.8–12.9 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.4% | 3.2–3.7 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.5% | 5.1–5.8 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | FL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 14.6% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 11.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 12.5% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 15.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 8.6% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 8.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 41.8% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 29.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 5.4% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968 |
| Households without a vehicle | 8.2% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972 |
| Broadband subscription | 95.2% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 91.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 44.5% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 33.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972 |
| Homeownership rate | 48.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 74.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 3.4% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 2.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972 |
| Foreign-born population | 16.9% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 11.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977 |
| Single-parent households | 44.3% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 52.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968 |
| Population 65+ | 16.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977 |
| Median age | 35.4 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972 |
| Median household income | $69,200 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946 |
| Median home value | $374,200 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932 |
| Median gross rent | $1,710 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | FL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 79.2 yr ± 0.56 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.56 years of 79.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured