Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32707

in Casselberry, FloridaPopulation 39,493

57.60/ 100

Ranked #6,723 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #259 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranked #30 of 92 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

180.6 days/year

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST43rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

304 units

in the top 8.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST81st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.3 mi

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST12th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, ZIP 32707, one of several in Casselberry, Florida lands in the top 21% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,723rd) and the top 27% of Florida (259th).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: subsidized affordable housing registers in the top 8.1% nationally. Distance to a community health center sits at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Walkability rests in the top 12.0% nationally, and modeled radon is in the bottom 8.1% nationally. Against that, modeled humid heat stands in the top 1.7% nationally, distance to a Superfund site settles in the bottom 8.2% nationally, and housing-cost burden lies in the top 11.7% nationally. Floodplain exposure resides in the top 12.4% nationally, outer-floodplain exposure lands in the top 13.2% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss registers in the top 14.4% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 32708, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.6%21.0–26.3
High blood pressure among adults32.5%29.2–36.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.5–9.0
Current asthma among adults9.4%8.4–10.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.7–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Depression among adults17.2%14.7–19.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.5%10.1–13.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.9%32.3–39.5
Obesity among adults30.1%24.9–35.6
Stroke among adults3.2%2.9–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.4%8.6–12.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.6%13.0–16.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.2%73.5–78.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.4%74.2–80.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.3%84.6–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.2%62.6–71.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.0%55.6–62.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.3%69.3–82.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%13.5–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.0%10.4–13.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.8%19.5–26.4
Short sleep duration among adults36.2%30.8–41.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.1%16.0–20.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.0%14.3–17.8
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.5–14.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.5%12.1–15.1
Any disability among adults28.8%25.4–32.5
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.8–7.2
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.6–8.1
Mobility disability among adults12.4%11.0–14.1
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.2–3.8
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.7–5.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6416.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)8.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)2.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle4.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription94.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate65.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population14.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households48.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+18.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age40.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$69,113$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$329,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,693$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.4 yr ± 0.7278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.72 years of 79.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured