Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32258

in Jacksonville, FloridaPopulation 40,408

60.07/ 100

Ranked #4,804 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 15.0%)

Ranked #188 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #13 of 60 Jacksonville, FL ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

166.3 days/year

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Park land

21.4%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST41st
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.2%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.7%

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.9%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

10.1%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.6%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

29.8%

in the bottom 10.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, ZIP 32258, one of several in Jacksonville, Florida stands in the top 15.0% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,804th) and the top 19% of Florida (188th).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: park land lands in the top 6.5% nationally, and modeled arsenic settles in the bottom 7.6% nationally. Modeled hearing disability rests in the bottom 8.1% nationally, and energy burden lands in the bottom 6.9% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease settles in the bottom 8.7% nationally, physicians rests in the top 10.9% nationally, and modeled mobility disability lands in the bottom 9.5% nationally. Modeled stroke settles in the bottom 8.3% nationally. By contrast, modeled humid heat rests in the top 2.4% nationally, and loud transportation noise lands in the top 11.6% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. ZIP 32256, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Jacksonville, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.2 ± 1.2 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.9 years — 3.3 years above them.

    Ranked #665 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.5%20.2–25.1
High blood pressure among adults29.8%26.8–33.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.6%6.9–8.4
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.6–10.7
Coronary heart disease among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.2%4.6–5.8
Depression among adults19.8%17.2–22.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.7%8.5–11.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.0%29.7–36.5
Obesity among adults29.5%25.2–34.3
Stroke among adults2.6%2.4–2.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.2%7.5–11.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.0%8.7–11.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.5%70.5–76.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.4%72.2–78.4
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%85.4–88.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.1%63.9–72.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.6%59.5–65.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.5%73.4–84.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.2%14.6–20.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.8%9.4–12.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.0%18.1–24.1
Short sleep duration among adults39.3%34.7–44.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.9%13.2–16.8
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%14.9–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults11.7%10.5–13.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.2%10.9–13.6
Any disability among adults25.1%22.2–28.3
Hearing disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.8
Independent living disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Mobility disability among adults10.1%8.9–11.5
Self-care disability among adults2.7%2.5–3.0
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.5–4.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6415.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)3.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)47.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)2.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle1.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription96.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate61.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population16.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households47.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+10.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age36.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$102,204$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$370,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,928$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.2 yr ± 0.6178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.61 years of 80.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured