Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32177

in Palatka, FloridaPopulation 25,645

36.64/ 100

Ranked #28,695 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.6%)

Ranked #931 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 4.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

7.4%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

167.7 days/year

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.8%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.5%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.9%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

494 units

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

25.6%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

30.6%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

39.2%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

By the composite measure, Palatka, Florida (ZIP 32177) sits in the bottom 10.6% nationally (28,695th) and the bottom 4.5% of Florida (931st).

continue reading

What the numbers press hardest on defines much of the story here: modeled self-care disability rests in the top 4.4% nationally, humid heat sits in the top 2.3% nationally, and vision disability registers in the top 5.3% nationally. Modeled independent living disability lands in the top 5.2% nationally, stroke resides in the top 4.7% nationally, and tooth loss lies in the top 6.6% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health settles in the top 7.3% nationally. On the encouraging side, subsidized affordable housing stands in the top 4.6% nationally, and physicians is in the top 4.6% nationally. Distance to an emergency room rests at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs.

In plain language, humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. ZIP 32043, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.8 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $47,796 predicts 77.2 years — 3.3 years below.

    Ranked #4,512 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.8 ± 1.1 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.1 years — 3.3 years below them.

    Ranked #2,581 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 67.2; chronic-disease standing 9.5 (bottom 10%) — 58 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,905 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.3%30.1–36.6
High blood pressure among adults43.9%40.1–47.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.5–10.2
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.3–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults10.3%9.4–11.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.0%11.8–14.3
Depression among adults19.8%16.9–22.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.1%16.0–20.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.7%36.7–44.8
Obesity among adults34.7%28.6–41.3
Stroke among adults5.9%5.5–6.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years25.6%21.9–29.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years17.0%14.8–19.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.1%77.5–82.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.8%75.5–81.8
Cholesterol screening among adults83.5%81.7–85.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.2%58.3–67.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults45.6%42.3–49.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.1%66.9–80.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.7%10.4–15.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.1%19.5–24.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.6%30.2–39.3
Short sleep duration among adults42.3%36.7–48.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults30.6%27.6–33.7
Frequent mental distress among adults20.5%18.4–22.7
Frequent physical distress among adults19.5%17.5–21.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.4%17.5–21.4
Any disability among adults40.9%36.8–45.2
Hearing disability among adults9.7%8.7–10.7
Independent living disability among adults13.5%12.3–14.8
Mobility disability among adults22.8%20.5–25.2
Self-care disability among adults7.4%6.8–8.0
Vision disability among adults9.8%9.0–10.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6422.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)15.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)8.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle10.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription85.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate67.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population2.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households43.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+20.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age39.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$47,796$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$165,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$951$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.8 yr ± 0.5878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.58 years of 73.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured