Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32064

in Live Oak, FloridaPopulation 7,758

46.11/ 100

Ranked #21,225 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #711 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Child-care access

1.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

158.5 days/year

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.67 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

14.0%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

66.7%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

42.8%

in the bottom 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

17.7 mi

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.13 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 32064, one of several in Live Oak, Florida places in the bottom 34% nationally (21,225th) and the bottom 27% of Florida (711th).

continue reading

The data opens on real and measurable burdens: modeled humid heat stands in the top 2.9% nationally, and unemployment registers in the top 4.5% nationally. Modeled pfas settles in the top 5.4% nationally, and homeownership sits in the bottom 6.0% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lies in the top 7.5% nationally. More encouragingly, childcare rests in the top 0.8% nationally, outpatient resides in the top 4.4% nationally, and physicians is in the top 5.8% nationally. Dental providers lands in the top 5.8% nationally, and mental-health providers stands in the top 7.7% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, childcare runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 32094, about 4.8 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.0 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $50,984 predicts 77.4 years — 2.4 years below.

    Ranked #3,232 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.7%28.8–34.6
High blood pressure among adults42.5%38.9–46.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.3–11.1
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.1–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults9.6%8.7–10.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%8.7–11.2
Depression among adults17.4%14.8–20.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.8%13.9–17.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.6%36.8–44.4
Obesity among adults37.5%31.9–43.2
Stroke among adults5.2%4.7–5.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.4%14.5–20.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.2%14.1–18.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.3%77.9–82.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.7%76.7–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults86.4%84.8–87.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.8%63.3–72.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.8%47.3–54.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.6%67.3–81.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.7%10.6–15.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.7%12.8–16.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.0%28.7–37.4
Short sleep duration among adults42.3%36.7–48.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.3%21.5–27.3
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%15.1–18.9
Frequent physical distress among adults16.7%14.9–18.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.7%14.0–17.5
Any disability among adults38.6%34.7–42.6
Hearing disability among adults9.6%8.6–10.7
Independent living disability among adults10.5%9.3–11.8
Mobility disability among adults20.0%17.8–22.3
Self-care disability among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
Vision disability among adults7.6%6.8–8.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6410.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)9.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)14.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle12.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription80.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate42.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population7.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households47.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+23.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age40.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$50,984$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$165,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$920$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.0 yr ± 0.7178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.71 years of 75.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured