Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32063

in Macclenny, FloridaPopulation 14,611

51.30/ 100

Ranked #14,412 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranked #531 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranked #32 of 60 Jacksonville, FL ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

163.7 days/year

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST45th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

13.2 mi

in the top 14.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

43.5%

in the top 27% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US73rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

Macclenny, Florida (ZIP 32063), by its overall standing, sits in the top 45% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,412th) and the bottom 45% of Florida (531st).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: distance to an emergency room lies at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 8.5% nationally. Distance to a nursing home settles at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Pharmacy registers in the top 16% nationally, and modeled radon stands in the bottom 14.8% nationally. By contrast, modeled humid heat lands in the top 2.5% nationally, and distance to a community health center is in the top 14.4% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas rests in the top 17% nationally, and floodplain exposure lies in the top 18% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 32065, about 11 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Jacksonville, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.6 ± 2.0 years. A median household income of $75,683 predicts 79.0 years — 3.4 years below.

    Ranked #4,564 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.3%23.6–29.2
High blood pressure among adults35.8%32.3–39.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.5%7.7–9.3
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.9–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.7–8.5
Depression among adults19.1%16.3–22.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.6%10.2–13.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.7%34.9–42.6
Obesity among adults33.9%28.1–40.1
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.4%12.7–18.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.4%10.6–14.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.6%72.8–78.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.5%72.9–79.7
Cholesterol screening among adults85.1%83.1–86.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.8%60.0–69.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.0%50.4–57.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.3%68.0–81.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.9%14.0–19.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.9%13.0–17.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.8%22.1–30.0
Short sleep duration among adults39.1%33.4–44.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.3%16.2–20.8
Frequent mental distress among adults18.2%16.3–20.3
Frequent physical distress among adults14.1%12.6–15.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.1%13.5–16.9
Any disability among adults31.7%28.0–35.7
Hearing disability among adults6.8%6.1–7.6
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.2–9.1
Mobility disability among adults13.6%12.0–15.5
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6414.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)14.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)5.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle5.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription92.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate82.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population1.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households31.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+16.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age34.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$75,683$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$260,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,385$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.6 yr ± 1.0478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.04 years of 75.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured