ZIP code
31810
in Geneva, GeorgiaPopulation 175
39.18/ 100
Ranked #27,278 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 15.0%)
Ranked #586 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 18%)
Ranked #25 of 36 Columbus, GA-AL ZIPs (bottom 31%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Diabetes
23.3%
in the top 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Stroke
7.1%
in the top 1.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
55.6%
in the top 0.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
9.4%
in the bottom 0.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
50.6%
in the bottom 1.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Self-care disability
7.6%
in the top 3.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›Arsenic in groundwater
0.99%
in the bottom 1.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST8thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
25.1%
in the top 3.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
11.2%
in the top 3.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Vision disability
9.5%
in the top 6.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST91stUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.
Full methodology ›The read
In its overall standing, Geneva, Georgia (ZIP 31810) lands in the bottom 15.0% nationally (27,278th) and the bottom 18% of Georgia (586th).
Reading across the data, the real pressures come first: modeled diabetes resides in the top 1.0% nationally, stroke settles in the top 1.1% nationally, and high blood pressure is in the top 0.7% nationally. Home broadband subscription sits in the bottom 1.6% nationally, modeled self-care disability lands in the top 3.9% nationally, and modeled mobility disability lies in the top 3.4% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease stands in the top 3.6% nationally, and vision disability rests in the top 6.0% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled binge drinking registers in the bottom 0.7% nationally, and arsenic resides in the bottom 1.9% nationally.
Put simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. On the overall standing, ZIP 31801, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Columbus, GA-AL metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 66%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 89%
8%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 41%
14%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 3%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 6%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 37%
11%
Disability
healthier than 7%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 35%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 16%
5%
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 88%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 92%
8%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 52%
11%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 59%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 3%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 14%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 31%
14%
Disability
healthier than 9%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 2%
5%
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 77%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 63%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 97%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 69%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 9%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 31%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 23%
14%
Disability
healthier than 17%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 11%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
31058
Georgiashares a border
Score 36.52
Closest healthier
31801
Georgiashares a border
Score 44.80
Similar health profile
36568
Alabama98% similar profile
Score 40.70
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 36.8% | 33.0–40.8 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 55.6% | 51.1–60.0 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 9.2% | 8.2–10.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.9% | 9.6–12.3 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 11.2% | 9.9–12.5 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 10.7% | 9.2–12.4 |
| Depression among adults | 16.4% | 13.8–19.2 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 23.3% | 20.6–26.2 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 44.2% | 39.4–49.0 |
| Obesity among adults | 43.0% | 34.4–51.9 |
| Stroke among adults | 7.1% | 6.3–7.9 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 25.2% | 21.2–29.3 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 14.1% | 11.2–17.4 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 86.0% | 83.8–88.0 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 84.7% | 82.0–87.2 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 90.4% | 88.9–91.9 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 65.0% | 59.7–70.2 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 50.1% | 46.3–54.1 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 75.9% | 68.0–82.8 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 9.4% | 7.7–11.6 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 17.1% | 14.1–20.2 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 37.3% | 31.7–43.2 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 40.6% | 33.3–48.2 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 29.9% | 25.8–34.1 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 16.0% | 14.1–18.1 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 18.2% | 15.9–20.7 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 15.5% | 13.4–17.8 |
| Any disability among adults | 40.4% | 35.4–45.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 9.8% | 8.7–11.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 12.3% | 10.6–14.1 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 25.1% | 21.8–28.5 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 7.6% | 6.6–8.7 |
| Vision disability among adults | 9.5% | 8.3–10.7 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 28.1% | 23.8–32.3 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 25.2% | 21.0–29.6 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 22.6% | 18.9–26.9 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 19.1% | 16.1–22.3 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 12.4% | 10.5–14.3 |
| Loneliness among adults | 37.5% | 31.8–43.0 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 13.3% | 11.3–15.4 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | GA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 22.3% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 13.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 40.5% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 18.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 30.9% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 12.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 10.7% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 21.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714 |
| Households without a vehicle | 17.7% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707 |
| Broadband subscription | 50.6% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 87.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 26.6% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 25.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707 |
| Homeownership rate | 91.1% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 73.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707 |
| Foreign-born population | 2.3% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 3.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720 |
| Single-parent households | 54.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705 |
| Population 65+ | 37.1% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720 |
| Median age | 51.4 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 39.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $993 ($694–$1,769) n=627 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | GA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 75.1 yr ± 2.28 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 76.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.28 years of 75.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured