Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

31795

in Ty Ty, GeorgiaPopulation 1,591

45.15/ 100

Ranked #22,248 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranked #409 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #5 of 15 Albany, GA ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Home broadband subscription

67.4%

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

44 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST43rd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

133.4 days/year

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 11.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$40,962

in the bottom 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Ty Ty, Georgia (ZIP 31795) ranks in the bottom 31% nationally (22,248th) and the bottom 42% of Georgia (409th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: modeled arsenic is in the bottom 8.8% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden settles in the bottom 11.1% nationally. Crowded housing resides at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. On the other side, home broadband subscription registers in the bottom 4.9% nationally, fatal road crashes rests in the top 5.6% nationally, and modeled humid heat stands in the top 9.0% nationally. Household income lies in the bottom 6.2% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise lands in the top 15% nationally. Recreation sits at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Modeled loneliness is in the top 18% nationally.

To spell things out, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Close by, ZIP 31793, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Albany, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.9%27.3–32.6
High blood pressure among adults41.5%38.2–44.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.1%7.5–8.8
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.5–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.9–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%8.0–10.0
Depression among adults21.6%19.0–24.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.6%14.0–17.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.9%36.5–43.4
Obesity among adults38.6%32.9–44.5
Stroke among adults4.4%4.1–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.8%14.3–19.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.0%11.8–16.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.4%77.0–81.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.3%75.3–81.1
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.5–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.1%59.2–66.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.1%52.0–58.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.8%67.6–79.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%12.3–16.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.5%16.3–20.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.4%27.7–35.1
Short sleep duration among adults37.2%32.3–42.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.5%22.0–26.9
Frequent mental distress among adults18.6%16.9–20.4
Frequent physical distress among adults16.5%15.0–18.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.6%14.9–18.3
Any disability among adults34.9%31.4–38.3
Hearing disability among adults7.8%7.0–8.6
Independent living disability among adults10.4%9.4–11.5
Mobility disability among adults17.3%15.4–19.1
Self-care disability among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
Vision disability among adults6.6%6.0–7.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.6%21.7–27.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.6%17.0–22.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.8%14.5–19.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.4%13.5–17.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.1%9.0–11.3
Loneliness among adults35.9%31.9–40.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.3%9.1–11.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6428.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)22.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)2.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle3.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription67.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate71.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population1.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households60.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+23.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age45.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$40,962$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$124,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$859$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.1 yr ± 1.1578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.15 years of 77.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured