Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

31513

in Baxley, GeorgiaPopulation 16,371

38.81/ 100

Ranked #27,538 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 14.2%)

Ranked #597 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

17.7%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.6%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST39th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

137 days/year

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.12 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.4%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

59.4%

in the bottom 12.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Baxley, Georgia (ZIP 31513) ranks in the bottom 14.2% nationally (27,538th) and the bottom 16% of Georgia (597th).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: distance to an emergency room registers at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 7.8% nationally, and mental-health providers rests in the top 8.5% nationally. Modeled pfas is in the bottom 10.2% nationally. Against that, modeled uninsured stands in the top 6.8% nationally, independent living disability settles in the top 8.4% nationally, and humid heat lies in the top 8.1% nationally. Modeled self-care disability resides in the top 9.1% nationally, modeled fair or poor health lands in the top 11.3% nationally, and home broadband subscription registers in the bottom 11.2% nationally.

In plainer terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 30436, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 15%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.7 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $46,203 predicts 77.0 years — 3.3 years below.

    Ranked #4,458 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 88.7; chronic-disease standing 17.1 — 72 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #974 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.0%27.7–34.4
High blood pressure among adults43.0%38.7–47.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.4–9.0
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.7–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.8%7.9–9.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.9%9.8–12.1
Depression among adults22.3%19.0–25.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.2%15.1–19.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.4%36.9–45.9
Obesity among adults40.7%32.4–49.2
Stroke among adults5.0%4.7–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.6%18.9–26.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years17.7%15.5–20.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.5%76.9–81.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.2%73.5–80.7
Cholesterol screening among adults83.7%81.8–85.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.4%54.2–64.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.0%45.2–52.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.6%64.4–79.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.5%11.0–16.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.6%18.1–23.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.9%30.0–39.9
Short sleep duration among adults38.2%31.4–45.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.6%25.5–31.8
Frequent mental distress among adults19.8%17.7–22.0
Frequent physical distress among adults18.4%16.4–20.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.0%17.0–21.1
Any disability among adults38.8%34.3–43.5
Hearing disability among adults8.9%7.9–9.9
Independent living disability among adults12.6%11.3–13.9
Mobility disability among adults20.3%18.0–22.6
Self-care disability among adults6.4%5.9–6.9
Vision disability among adults8.2%7.6–8.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.3%21.7–29.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.7%21.6–28.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults22.4%19.7–25.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.2%15.9–20.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.5%11.1–14.0
Loneliness among adults36.8%31.6–42.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.8–14.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate22.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6428.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)15.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)3.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle6.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription76.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate70.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population5.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households55.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+18.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age39.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$46,203$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$76,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$738$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.7 yr ± 0.6878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.68 years of 73.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured