Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

31774

in Ocilla, GeorgiaPopulation 5,896

43.73/ 100

Ranked #23,676 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranked #459 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Pharmacy access

0.59 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

39.2%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST40th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

133.2 days/year

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

10.1%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

16.6%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Ocilla, Georgia (ZIP 31774) ranks in the bottom 26% nationally (23,676th) and the bottom 35% of Georgia (459th).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: pharmacy lands in the top 3.5% nationally, and grocery sits in the top 3.7% nationally. Distance to an emergency room is at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled arsenic settles in the bottom 8.0% nationally, and pfas resides in the bottom 9.2% nationally. Distance to a community health center registers at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Set against that, modeled loneliness rests in the top 5.7% nationally, humid heat stands in the top 9.1% nationally, and uninsured lies in the top 8.1% nationally. Poverty lands in the top 11.6% nationally.

To spell things out, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Close by, ZIP 31733, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.5 ± 1.6 years. A median household income of $50,833 predicts 77.4 years — 1.9 years below.

    Ranked #2,459 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.8%25.7–32.2
High blood pressure among adults42.0%37.9–46.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.3%6.6–8.0
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.6–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.8–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.8%7.9–9.9
Depression among adults20.9%18.0–24.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.8%13.9–17.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.7%34.5–43.1
Obesity among adults41.0%33.2–49.6
Stroke among adults4.5%4.2–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.7%16.3–23.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.6%14.4–19.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.3%75.7–80.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.1%74.5–81.5
Cholesterol screening among adults84.6%82.5–86.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.7%56.4–66.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.6%47.7–55.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.4%64.9–80.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.9%11.4–16.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.2%15.8–20.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.3%28.7–38.5
Short sleep duration among adults38.9%31.9–46.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.0%23.1–29.2
Frequent mental distress among adults19.0%17.0–21.3
Frequent physical distress among adults16.4%14.6–18.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.5%15.6–19.6
Any disability among adults35.9%31.7–40.5
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.7–8.4
Independent living disability among adults11.2%10.1–12.5
Mobility disability among adults18.0%15.9–20.4
Self-care disability among adults5.6%5.1–6.2
Vision disability among adults7.4%6.7–8.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.3%22.6–30.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.3%20.2–26.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.2%17.5–23.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.3%15.9–20.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.6–13.6
Loneliness among adults39.2%33.5–44.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.5–13.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate24.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6422.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)13.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)0.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle4.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription82.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate64.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households40.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+16.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age38.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$50,833$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$99,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$863$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.5 yr ± 0.8478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.84 years of 75.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured