Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

31716

in Baconton, GeorgiaPopulation 2,481

43.47/ 100

Ranked #23,940 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranked #466 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

1.0%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

44.3 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

139.4 days/year

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.37 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

37.7%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST56th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

2.7 mi

in the bottom 13.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.24%

in the top 43% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US57th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

Baconton, Georgia (ZIP 31716), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 25% nationally (23,940th) and the bottom 34% of Georgia (466th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: modeled arsenic registers in the bottom 2.3% nationally, pharmacy lands in the top 9.4% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the bottom 10.0% nationally. Working the other way, fatal road crashes lies in the top 5.5% nationally, modeled humid heat settles in the top 7.5% nationally, and modeled loneliness stands in the top 9.8% nationally. Modeled obesity is in the top 10.2% nationally, and diabetes rests in the top 12.3% nationally. Home broadband subscription sits in the bottom 13.7% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site registers in the bottom 13.7% nationally.

In everyday language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 31721, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 76.7; chronic-disease standing 21.4 — 55 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,096 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.7%26.2–33.0
High blood pressure among adults44.9%40.5–49.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.1%7.3–8.9
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.8–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.2–8.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.1%8.0–10.4
Depression among adults21.0%17.8–24.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.9%14.8–19.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.7%35.3–44.1
Obesity among adults42.7%34.4–51.1
Stroke among adults4.9%4.4–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.7%17.1–24.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.9%10.9–15.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.8%78.2–83.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.1%76.6–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults87.3%85.5–88.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.9%58.2–68.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.6%48.5–56.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.7%66.5–81.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.2%10.7–16.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.5%14.9–20.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.1%26.3–36.2
Short sleep duration among adults40.9%33.6–48.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.8%21.7–28.1
Frequent mental distress among adults18.4%16.3–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults16.4%14.5–18.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.1%14.2–18.2
Any disability among adults34.9%30.4–39.5
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.7–8.5
Independent living disability among adults10.9%9.6–12.2
Mobility disability among adults18.6%16.2–21.1
Self-care disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.4
Vision disability among adults7.1%6.4–7.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.9%21.3–28.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.3%18.1–24.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.0%16.3–22.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.6%14.2–19.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.6–12.5
Loneliness among adults37.7%32.3–43.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.5%9.9–13.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6421.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)11.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)6.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle4.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription78.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate83.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population4.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households59.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+24.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age46.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$60,953$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$119,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$697$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.2 yr ± 1.9478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.94 years of 74.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured