Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

31648

in Statenville, GeorgiaPopulation 1,052

39.88/ 100

Ranked #26,842 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #576 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #13 of 18 Valdosta, GA ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

43.5%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

21.4%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

155.3 days/year

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

10.4%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

55.4%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

29.4%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US8th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People without health insurance
  • People living in poverty
  • Housing insecurity

Barriers to reaching care

  • Distance to the nearest emergency room
  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Statenville, Georgia (ZIP 31648) sits in the bottom 16% nationally (26,842nd) and the bottom 19% of Georgia (576th).

continue reading

A rural profile defined by a handful of clear readings: home broadband subscription settles in the bottom 1.1% nationally, modeled uninsured lands in the top 3.7% nationally, and modeled humid heat rests in the top 3.3% nationally. Crowded housing settles in the top 4.3% nationally, modeled colon screening lands in the bottom 5.3% nationally, and poverty rests in the top 7.2% nationally. On the stronger side, grocery settles in the top 0.3% nationally, and elder services lands in the top 0.7% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss rests in the bottom 7.6% nationally, and recreation settles in the top 7.6% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, grocery runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 31636, just across the boundary. Across other measures, the ZIP also shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Valdosta, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 39%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 91.6 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 38.2 — 53 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,231 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.1%23.9–30.6
High blood pressure among adults38.8%34.5–43.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.9%6.1–7.6
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.5–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%7.5–10.4
Depression among adults21.4%18.1–25.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.8%13.7–18.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.3%33.9–42.8
Obesity among adults41.8%33.0–50.8
Stroke among adults4.2%3.7–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.4%18.8–26.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years21.4%18.0–25.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.9%73.9–79.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.4%71.4–79.2
Cholesterol screening among adults83.1%80.8–85.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years55.4%49.7–60.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.7%47.6–55.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.4%62.3–79.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%11.9–17.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.1%15.8–22.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.9%29.3–40.6
Short sleep duration among adults39.4%32.2–47.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.8%23.8–31.7
Frequent mental distress among adults19.2%16.9–21.6
Frequent physical distress among adults17.5%15.1–19.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.6%16.1–21.1
Any disability among adults37.0%31.7–42.1
Hearing disability among adults7.9%6.9–8.9
Independent living disability among adults11.4%9.9–13.0
Mobility disability among adults18.1%15.5–20.7
Self-care disability among adults5.8%5.1–6.7
Vision disability among adults8.2%7.2–9.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.0%21.3–29.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.4%21.4–29.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults21.1%17.6–24.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.3%16.4–22.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.6%10.9–14.4
Loneliness among adults36.9%31.4–42.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.6–14.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate29.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6442.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)8.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)6.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)2.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription43.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate56.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)10.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population9.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households28.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+15.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age32.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$43,750$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$78,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,171$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.7 yr ± 2.4878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.48 years of 72.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured