Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

99557

in Aniak, AlaskaPopulation 714

24.95/ 100

Ranked #31,478 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.9%)

Ranked #151 of 211 Alaska ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Energy-cost burden

10.8%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST57th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

56.9%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST31st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0.0087 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

83.9 mi

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST55th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

32%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST59th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

85.1 mi

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST42nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

71.6 mi

in the top 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST50th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

51.2%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST39th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.8%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST68th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its severe level: severe means at least four of the six health-need readings and at least four of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People without health insurance
  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health

Barriers to reaching care

  • Distance to the nearest emergency room
  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies
  • Households with no vehicle

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

On the composite measure, Aniak, Alaska (ZIP 99557) stands in the bottom 1.9% nationally (31,478th) and the bottom 28% of Alaska (151st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

On the ground here, a handful of readings tell most of the story: modeled energy burden stands in the top 0.4% nationally, and mammography sits in the bottom 0.5% nationally. Walkability resides in the bottom 0.3% nationally, and distance to a nursing home stands in the top 0.4% nationally. Modeled tooth loss sits in the top 2.2% nationally, distance to an emergency room resides in the top 0.5% nationally, and modeled colon screening stands in the bottom 2.5% nationally. Modeled vision disability sits in the top 3.4% nationally. More positively, modeled air-toxics cancer risk resides in the bottom 0.5% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands in the top 0.5% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, distance to an emergency room runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. ZIP 99576, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Environmental HazardPartial

in the top 0.00%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

22%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.06%

17%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 1%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

9%

Disability

healthier than 3%

8%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.6%

6%

No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.9%22.0–27.8
High blood pressure among adults38.3%34.4–42.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.5%5.0–6.1
Current asthma among adults13.7%12.0–15.4
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%7.2–9.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.9%9.6–12.4
Depression among adults21.8%18.6–25.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%11.9–15.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.7%29.0–36.5
Obesity among adults39.5%33.3–45.9
Stroke among adults5.0%4.6–5.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years32.0%26.9–37.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.3%13.5–19.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure64.1%60.6–67.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults63.9%59.5–68.1
Cholesterol screening among adults70.3%67.1–73.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years51.2%45.8–56.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults36.7%33.2–40.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years56.9%47.5–65.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.0%13.2–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults31.6%27.8–35.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.4%29.6–39.9
Short sleep duration among adults41.8%36.0–47.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults32.6%28.7–36.8
Frequent mental distress among adults21.9%19.4–24.6
Frequent physical distress among adults20.3%17.9–22.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults23.0%20.3–26.1
Any disability among adults43.1%38.2–48.3
Hearing disability among adults11.6%10.3–13.0
Independent living disability among adults14.9%13.1–16.8
Mobility disability among adults20.2%17.7–23.0
Self-care disability among adults6.7%5.9–7.5
Vision disability among adults10.8%9.7–12.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults35.9%31.5–40.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults37.3%32.4–42.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults30.6%26.1–34.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.7%22.9–30.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults22.0%19.3–24.8
Loneliness among adults37.4%32.6–42.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults19.5%16.8–22.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.7% (1.4–38.0%) n=230
Uninsured 18–6418.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28620.8% (8.5–50.0%) n=225
No HS diploma (25+)9.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.4% (1.4–25.1%) n=230
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.0% (0.0–37.4%) n=230
Unemployment rate (16+)12.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2748.6% (0.0–29.5%) n=226
Households without a vehicle43.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,32231.1% (1.0–95.5%) n=228
Broadband subscription83.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.8% (49.6–96.0%) n=228
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.0% (0.0–33.2%) n=228
Homeownership rate56.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32271.7% (45.5–94.4%) n=228
Crowded housing (>1 per room)14.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3228.5% (0.0–48.6%) n=228
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–11.1%) n=231
Single-parent households35.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08744.2% (18.7–68.2%) n=221
Population 65+9.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55312.7% (3.0–29.7%) n=231
Median age28.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.7 yr (22.6–53.6) n=226
Median household income$74,286$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,823 ($39,905–$108,850) n=197
Median home value$259,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,500 ($66,830–$395,940) n=178
Median gross rent$1,361$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,078 ($688–$1,571) n=143
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.0 yr ± 2.2578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (75.1–84.7) n=222

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.25 years of 74.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured