Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

27509

in Butner, North CarolinaPopulation 7,766

42.46/ 100

Ranked #24,861 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranked #653 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tooth loss

29.9%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

18.6%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.13 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

14.0%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

20.5%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

27.3%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Park land

13.7%

in the top 9.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

37.7%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57.9%

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

19.5%

in the top 11.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

The read

Butner, North Carolina (ZIP 27509), overall, ranks in the bottom 22% nationally (24,861st) and the bottom 18% of North Carolina (653rd).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: mental-health providers lies in the top 7.9% nationally, and park land stands in the top 9.5% nationally. Set against that, modeled tooth loss rests in the top 3.2% nationally, uninsured registers in the top 5.8% nationally, and transportation resides in the top 8.0% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity settles in the top 8.3% nationally, and food insecurity is in the top 8.4% nationally. Fiber broadband sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled loneliness lands in the top 9.8% nationally, and colon screening lies in the bottom 9.1% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. ZIP 27503, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.4%20.5–26.5
High blood pressure among adults39.8%35.3–44.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.4%4.9–6.0
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.3–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.3–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.4%7.4–9.6
Depression among adults20.9%17.4–24.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.8%12.0–15.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.0%29.8–38.4
Obesity among adults38.2%30.1–47.1
Stroke among adults4.3%3.9–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years29.9%25.1–35.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years18.6%15.8–22.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.0%68.7–75.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.3%72.0–80.3
Cholesterol screening among adults81.2%78.4–83.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.9%52.4–63.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.0%45.9–54.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.2%67.0–82.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.4%12.4–18.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.5%16.8–22.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.7%25.8–36.0
Short sleep duration among adults39.4%32.0–46.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.8%23.3–30.3
Frequent mental distress among adults18.6%16.2–21.1
Frequent physical distress among adults14.6%12.8–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.5%17.0–22.1
Any disability among adults38.0%33.0–43.1
Hearing disability among adults7.3%6.4–8.3
Independent living disability among adults10.7%9.4–12.1
Mobility disability among adults16.7%14.5–19.1
Self-care disability among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Vision disability among adults8.0%7.2–8.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults31.5%27.2–35.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.3%23.5–31.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults22.2%19.2–25.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.5%17.8–23.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults14.0%12.2–15.9
Loneliness among adults37.7%32.3–43.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.7–15.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–6422.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)27.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)6.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle1.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription81.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate65.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population12.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households56.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+16.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age43.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$73,136$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$215,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$1,241$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured