Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

31553

in Nahunta, GeorgiaPopulation 5,386

45.03/ 100

Ranked #22,367 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranked #413 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #6 of 13 Brunswick-St. Simons, GA ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mental-health provider access

0.58 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.5%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

149.2 days/year

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.58 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.58 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

11.8 mi

in the top 11.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

27%

in the top 11.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

70%

in the bottom 14.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Nahunta, Georgia (ZIP 31553) sits in the bottom 30% nationally (22,367th) and the bottom 42% of Georgia (413th).

continue reading

The main burdens in the data show plainly and lead the picture: modeled humid heat registers in the top 5.0% nationally, floodplain exposure lands in the top 11.8% nationally, and modeled loneliness resides in the top 12.0% nationally. More positively, mental-health providers lies in the top 0.7% nationally, fiber broadband settles in the top 3.4% nationally, and outpatient stands in the top 5.8% nationally. Childcare is in the top 7.7% nationally. Distance to a community health center rests at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits in the top 11.4% nationally, and modeled radon registers in the bottom 6.7% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, mental-health providers runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. ZIP 31568, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Brunswick-St. Simons, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.2%25.8–32.7
High blood pressure among adults38.4%34.2–42.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%7.9–9.6
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.3–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.7–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%7.8–10.3
Depression among adults23.7%20.1–27.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.2%11.4–15.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.0%35.5–44.6
Obesity among adults37.5%29.1–46.2
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.0%14.9–21.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.8%10.3–15.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.3%75.4–80.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.9%73.0–80.5
Cholesterol screening among adults84.9%82.6–86.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.2%56.9–67.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.5%51.8–59.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.0%61.1–78.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.7%12.7–18.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.7%15.0–20.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.6%24.7–34.6
Short sleep duration among adults36.7%29.9–44.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.5%19.3–25.7
Frequent mental distress among adults19.2%17.0–21.5
Frequent physical distress among adults16.1%14.1–18.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.0%14.8–19.2
Any disability among adults34.5%29.9–39.2
Hearing disability among adults8.0%7.1–9.0
Independent living disability among adults10.2%8.9–11.6
Mobility disability among adults16.2%13.9–18.4
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.0–5.2
Vision disability among adults5.8%5.1–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.9%19.2–27.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.0%13.2–19.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.1%10.8–15.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.4–14.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.5–10.1
Loneliness among adults37.1%31.3–43.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.7–9.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6427.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)12.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)3.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle2.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription77.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate78.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population2.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households53.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+21.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age42.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$52,665$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$99,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$754$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.9 yr ± 1.4678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.46 years of 75.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured