Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

31539

in Hazlehurst, GeorgiaPopulation 14,201

36.40/ 100

Ranked #28,807 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.2%)

Ranked #643 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 9.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

19.6%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.3%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.2%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

25.4%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.8%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

38.7%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

8.9%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

29.7%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

20.2%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

9.6%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Hazlehurst, Georgia (ZIP 31539), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 10.2% nationally (28,807th) and the bottom 9.6% of Georgia (643rd).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled arsenic registers in the bottom 5.0% nationally. Distance to an emergency room settles at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, modeled uninsured sits in the top 4.9% nationally, independent living disability lies in the top 5.8% nationally, and tooth loss rests in the top 6.8% nationally. Modeled self-care disability resides in the top 6.8% nationally, loneliness is in the top 6.8% nationally, and vision disability lands in the top 7.9% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health stands in the top 8.9% nationally, and cognitive disability registers in the top 8.5% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 30473, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.4 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $38,737 predicts 76.3 years — 3.0 years below.

    Ranked #4,097 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 89.5; chronic-disease standing 19.5 — 70 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,071 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.0%26.7–33.3
High blood pressure among adults41.4%37.2–45.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.6%6.9–8.4
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.8–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults8.6%7.8–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.1%10.0–12.3
Depression among adults22.7%19.3–26.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.8%14.8–18.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.9%34.6–43.4
Obesity among adults41.4%33.2–50.0
Stroke among adults4.9%4.6–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years25.4%21.5–29.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years19.6%17.4–22.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.9%75.2–80.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.3%72.4–79.9
Cholesterol screening among adults82.4%80.3–84.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.6%53.4–63.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.5%44.6–52.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.0%60.5–76.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.0%11.3–16.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.7%19.0–24.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.7%31.7–41.9
Short sleep duration among adults36.9%30.4–44.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.7%26.6–32.8
Frequent mental distress among adults20.7%18.4–23.1
Frequent physical distress among adults18.7%16.7–20.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.2%18.1–22.3
Any disability among adults40.7%36.1–45.4
Hearing disability among adults8.8%7.9–9.8
Independent living disability among adults13.3%12.0–14.7
Mobility disability among adults20.8%18.5–23.2
Self-care disability among adults6.8%6.2–7.4
Vision disability among adults8.9%8.1–9.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.9%22.3–29.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.3%24.1–30.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults25.1%22.3–28.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.0%17.6–22.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.9%12.4–15.4
Loneliness among adults38.7%33.3–44.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.5%11.8–15.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6432.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)23.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)7.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle9.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription76.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate71.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population6.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households41.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+15.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age41.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$38,737$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$119,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$646$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.4 yr ± 0.6378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.63 years of 73.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured