Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

31624

in Axson, GeorgiaPopulation 1,913

37.33/ 100

Ranked #28,372 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 11.6%)

Ranked #624 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 12.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

5.8%

in the bottom 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

19.6%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

12.2%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

145 days/year

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.6%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

38.3%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

20.1%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

29.3%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

68.4%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST46th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Axson, Georgia (ZIP 31624), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 11.6% nationally (28,372nd) and the bottom 12.3% of Georgia (624th).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: modeled pfas stands in the bottom 1.8% nationally. Unemployment resides at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, modeled uninsured sits in the top 4.9% nationally, and crowded housing stands in the top 3.3% nationally. Modeled humid heat resides in the top 6.1% nationally, and independent living disability sits in the top 8.4% nationally. Modeled loneliness stands in the top 7.8% nationally, and cognitive disability resides in the top 9.0% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health sits in the top 9.8% nationally, and mammography stands in the bottom 8.6% nationally.

Defined simply, for reference, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 31535, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 90.8 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 24.8 — 66 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,324 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.2%26.2–32.7
High blood pressure among adults40.7%36.7–45.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.6%6.9–8.4
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.5–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.5–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.9%9.5–12.5
Depression among adults23.5%20.4–27.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.9%14.1–17.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.3%36.3–44.8
Obesity among adults41.2%33.6–49.8
Stroke among adults4.5%4.1–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.9%18.6–25.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years19.6%16.7–22.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.2%74.5–79.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.7%72.1–79.3
Cholesterol screening among adults82.4%80.2–84.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.5%52.9–63.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults46.9%43.2–50.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.4%59.3–76.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%12.6–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.1%19.0–25.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.9%30.9–41.4
Short sleep duration among adults36.8%30.1–43.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.3%25.8–33.0
Frequent mental distress among adults20.5%18.4–23.0
Frequent physical distress among adults18.9%16.8–21.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.1%17.8–22.7
Any disability among adults39.2%34.6–44.1
Hearing disability among adults8.9%7.9–9.9
Independent living disability among adults12.6%11.0–14.2
Mobility disability among adults19.5%17.2–22.2
Self-care disability among adults6.3%5.5–7.1
Vision disability among adults8.2%7.3–9.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.6%21.2–28.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.6%21.3–28.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults21.5%18.4–25.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.9%15.5–20.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.8–14.0
Loneliness among adults38.3%33.1–43.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.5%10.0–13.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate22.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6447.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)30.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle3.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription87.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate65.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)12.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population16.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households62.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+12.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age40.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$50,903$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$95,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$844$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.0 yr ± 1.1278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.12 years of 74.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured