Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

11769

in Oakdale, New YorkPopulation 8,935

62.96/ 100

Ranked #2,991 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.4%)

Ranked #392 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #517 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27.2%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

40.2%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.1%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.0%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.1%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.6%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$123,558

in the top 8.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

The read

Oakdale, New York (ZIP 11769), overall, ranks in the top 9.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,991st) and the top 23% of New York (392nd).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: modeled loneliness rests in the bottom 3.8% nationally, fiber broadband registers in the top 6.5% nationally, and modeled transportation resides in the bottom 7.6% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability settles in the bottom 5.4% nationally, modeled utility shutoff is in the bottom 8.6% nationally, and household income sits in the top 8.5% nationally. Set against that, PFOA in drinking water lands at the national maximum, and PFOS in drinking water lies at the national maximum. PFAS in drinking water stands at the national maximum, and floodplain exposure rests in the top 6.2% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. ZIP 11716, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.2%25.7–30.8
High blood pressure among adults34.3%31.4–37.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.3%10.3–12.3
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.3–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%5.9–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.1%5.1–7.0
Depression among adults16.8%14.7–19.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.9%8.6–11.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.3%39.2–45.2
Obesity among adults28.4%24.8–32.0
Stroke among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.2%6.0–8.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.3%3.6–5.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.4%77.7–82.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.6%81.5–85.6
Cholesterol screening among adults92.2%91.2–93.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.5%67.5–73.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.6%67.2–72.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.2%75.8–84.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.9%13.9–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.0%7.2–10.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.2%19.0–25.4
Short sleep duration among adults35.9%32.9–39.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.3%12.2–16.3
Frequent mental distress among adults13.6%12.1–15.3
Frequent physical distress among adults12.0%10.5–13.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.1%8.7–11.5
Any disability among adults26.3%23.1–29.3
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.6–7.2
Independent living disability among adults6.3%5.4–7.3
Mobility disability among adults12.7%10.9–14.6
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.6–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.2–4.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.2%17.6–23.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.1–10.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.5–8.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.5–9.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.3–5.8
Loneliness among adults27.2%24.0–30.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.6%3.9–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–642.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)4.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)44.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)3.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle3.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription92.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate84.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population4.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households60.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+26.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age51.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$123,558$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$607,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$2,239$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 1.8278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.82 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured