Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

57579

in White River, South DakotaPopulation 1,277

25.79/ 100

Ranked #31,387 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 2.2%)

Ranked #341 of 360 South Dakota ZIPs (bottom 5.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Vision disability

12.6%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

35.1%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

8.8%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

14.4%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

16.1%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

7.0%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

22.5%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

12.1%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

26.3%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

33.8 mi

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, White River, South Dakota (ZIP 57579) lands in the bottom 2.2% nationally (31,387th) and the bottom 5.3% of South Dakota (341st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

On the ground, a handful of readings define this area: modeled vision disability rests in the top 1.6% nationally, and tooth loss stands in the top 1.2% nationally. Modeled self-care disability lies in the top 1.6% nationally, and hearing disability lands in the top 0.7% nationally. Modeled independent living disability sits in the top 1.6% nationally, stroke is in the top 1.3% nationally, and diabetes settles in the top 1.4% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease resides in the top 1.6% nationally, modeled mobility disability registers in the top 2.1% nationally, and distance to an emergency room rests in the top 1.5% nationally.

For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 57521, just across the boundary, ranks better overall. Modeled hearing disability rests in the top 0.7% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 46%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.4%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 89%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.9%30.3–37.4
High blood pressure among adults44.9%40.6–49.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.9%8.0–9.8
Current asthma among adults13.2%11.7–14.8
Coronary heart disease among adults12.1%10.9–13.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults14.5%12.8–16.3
Depression among adults22.4%19.0–25.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults22.5%19.8–25.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.8%32.6–41.1
Obesity among adults46.9%38.8–54.6
Stroke among adults7.0%6.3–7.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years35.1%30.0–40.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.5%12.1–16.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.6%75.7–81.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.8%73.1–80.1
Cholesterol screening among adults81.1%78.8–83.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years53.3%47.9–58.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults46.4%42.5–50.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.7%59.0–75.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.0%11.5–16.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults31.7%27.9–35.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults39.7%34.3–45.1
Short sleep duration among adults38.7%32.6–44.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults33.7%29.7–37.6
Frequent mental distress among adults20.0%17.7–22.4
Frequent physical distress among adults21.2%18.8–23.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.6%19.1–24.0
Any disability among adults47.0%41.9–51.9
Hearing disability among adults14.4%12.8–15.9
Independent living disability among adults16.1%14.4–18.0
Mobility disability among adults26.3%23.2–29.4
Self-care disability among adults8.8%8.0–9.8
Vision disability among adults12.6%11.4–13.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate38.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (1.1–33.5%) n=364
Uninsured 18–6445.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.6% (0.0–33.2%) n=365
No HS diploma (25+)15.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.0% (0.8–15.3%) n=366
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (10.3–40.7%) n=366
Unemployment rate (16+)7.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–8.0%) n=365
Households without a vehicle5.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.9% (0.0–9.6%) n=364
Broadband subscription86.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (73.7–96.3%) n=364
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.5% (5.2–30.6%) n=364
Homeownership rate63.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.9% (57.2–94.8%) n=364
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.6% (0.0–10.2%) n=364
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–5.3%) n=367
Single-parent households57.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.7% (32.7–81.4%) n=362
Population 65+18.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.3% (8.4–33.0%) n=367
Median age37.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (27.6–56.7) n=365
Median household income$56,474$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$74,865 ($51,211–$102,582) n=336
Median home value$61,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($79,000–$321,400) n=311
Median gross rent$846$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$763 ($544–$1,089) n=243
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.2 yr ± 1.9378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.4–84.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.93 years of 77.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured