ZIP code
31033
in Haddock, GeorgiaPopulation 2,755
46.07/ 100
Ranked #21,277 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)
Ranked #384 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 46%)
Ranked #12 of 21 Macon-Bibb County, GA ZIPs (bottom 43%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Crowded housing
9.9%
in the top 4.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
68.1%
in the bottom 5.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST6thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
69.6%
in the top 9.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST95thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
37.8%
in the top 9.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST59thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Dry extreme heat
23.4 days/year
in the top 20% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST91stUS80thDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.
Full methodology ›The read
In overall standing, Haddock, Georgia (ZIP 31033) comes out in the bottom 34% nationally (21,277th) and the bottom 46% of Georgia (384th).
The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: modeled tree cover stands in the top 9.4% nationally, civic lands in the top 14.9% nationally, and park land is in the top 15% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides in the top 17% nationally. By contrast, crowded housing rests in the top 4.7% nationally, and home broadband subscription lies in the bottom 5.2% nationally. Modeled loneliness sits in the top 9.5% nationally, and humid heat settles in the top 13.5% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity registers in the top 16% nationally, and obesity stands in the top 14.4% nationally.
Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 31024, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Macon-Bibb County, GA metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 86%
14%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 44%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 49%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 28%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 21%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 28%
11%
Disability
healthier than 29%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 32%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 39%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 83%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 65%
13%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 40%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 40%
8%
Disability
healthier than 45%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 53%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 38%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 39%
16%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 24%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 85%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 85%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 50%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 40%
16%
Disability
healthier than 50%
7%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 35%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 35%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 25%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 15%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Clean environment, heavy chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 86.4; chronic-disease standing 27.9 — 59 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #1,851 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
31024
Georgiashares a border
Score 49.21
Closest healthier
31032
Georgiashares a border
Score 52.28
Similar health profile
29032
South Carolina98% similar profile
Score 45.61
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 30.4% | 27.6–33.4 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 43.0% | 39.4–46.7 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 7.8% | 7.2–8.5 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.0% | 9.9–12.2 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 7.5% | 6.8–8.3 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 8.7% | 7.8–9.6 |
| Depression among adults | 20.8% | 18.0–23.8 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 16.2% | 14.5–18.0 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 39.8% | 36.2–43.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 41.7% | 35.0–48.8 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.7% | 4.3–5.0 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 17.7% | 15.0–20.7 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 12.3% | 10.4–14.2 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 80.5% | 78.2–82.5 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 79.9% | 76.8–82.7 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 87.1% | 85.4–88.6 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 64.9% | 60.6–69.0 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 53.7% | 50.4–57.0 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 75.8% | 69.5–81.2 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.4% | 11.2–15.8 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 17.6% | 15.5–20.0 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 32.0% | 28.0–36.3 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 39.6% | 34.0–45.4 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 24.1% | 21.6–26.7 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 18.5% | 16.6–20.5 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 16.2% | 14.6–18.0 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 16.2% | 14.5–17.9 |
| Any disability among adults | 34.9% | 31.2–38.8 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 7.2% | 6.4–8.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 10.5% | 9.5–11.6 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 17.9% | 16.0–19.9 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.3% | 4.9–5.8 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.6% | 6.1–7.2 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 25.4% | 22.4–28.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 20.1% | 17.6–22.6 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 17.6% | 15.4–19.8 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 16.2% | 14.2–18.1 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 10.5% | 9.3–11.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 37.8% | 33.3–42.2 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 10.8% | 9.6–12.1 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | GA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 8.2% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 13.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 12.4% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 18.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 14.9% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 12.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 6.9% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 21.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 4.6% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714 |
| Households without a vehicle | 1.2% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707 |
| Broadband subscription | 68.1% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 87.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 16.7% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 25.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707 |
| Homeownership rate | 86.9% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 73.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 9.9% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.7% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 3.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720 |
| Single-parent households | 58.9% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705 |
| Population 65+ | 24.5% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720 |
| Median age | 41.1 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 39.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715 |
| Median household income | $68,942 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677 |
| Median home value | $169,900 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666 |
| Median gross rent | $1,040 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $993 ($694–$1,769) n=627 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | GA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 73.5 yr ± 1.09 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 76.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.09 years of 73.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured