Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30705

in Chatsworth, GeorgiaPopulation 33,726

46.05/ 100

Ranked #21,290 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #385 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Too few scored ZIPs in the Dalton, GA metro area to rank within it.

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

0.88%

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Park land

17.9%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

58%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST49th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

16.3%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US84th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Chatsworth, Georgia (ZIP 30705) ranks in the bottom 34% nationally (21,290th) and the bottom 46% of Georgia (385th).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: park land stands in the top 7.7% nationally, and modeled arsenic settles in the bottom 9.8% nationally. Distance to a community health center lies at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled tree cover resides in the top 12.6% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Against that, modeled expected annual loss registers in the top 3.4% nationally, nitrate sits in the top 6.7% nationally, and pfas rests in the top 8.8% nationally. Modeled uninsured is in the top 8.6% nationally, and loneliness stands in the top 10.9% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 30540, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Dalton, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.0 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $69,036 predicts 78.6 years — 3.6 years below.

    Ranked #4,800 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.2%23.6–30.6
High blood pressure among adults36.4%31.8–40.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.1%7.2–8.9
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.0–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.2–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.5%7.6–9.5
Depression among adults22.7%18.8–26.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.1%11.3–15.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.7%33.8–43.4
Obesity among adults41.5%32.2–50.3
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.9%14.7–21.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.3%14.1–18.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.4%73.0–79.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.7%71.3–79.4
Cholesterol screening among adults84.5%82.4–86.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.8%55.4–65.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.6%51.7–59.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.4%63.0–78.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.9%12.6–19.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.3%14.7–19.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.9%23.9–34.0
Short sleep duration among adults35.6%29.1–42.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.9%19.8–26.0
Frequent mental distress among adults18.8%16.5–21.1
Frequent physical distress among adults16.0%14.0–18.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.1%15.1–19.2
Any disability among adults33.7%28.8–38.4
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.8–8.6
Independent living disability among adults9.9%8.8–11.1
Mobility disability among adults15.4%13.3–17.6
Self-care disability among adults4.5%4.1–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.9%5.3–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.7%20.3–27.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.3%15.0–19.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.2%11.5–15.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.7%11.9–15.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.1%8.1–10.3
Loneliness among adults37.4%32.1–42.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.1–9.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6420.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)22.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)4.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle4.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription88.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate74.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population7.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households49.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+15.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age39.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$69,036$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$189,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$860$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.0 yr ± 0.5978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.59 years of 75.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured